• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

hwbattleRadeon Pro Duo vs GTX 980TI SLI vs Fury X CF

C

csbin

Senior member
http://www.hwbattle.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=hottopic&wr_id=2040



12S1FM.jpg



N9kLE.png



bCFE6.png


JnQLE.png


Znusm.png


MajnL.png


ofovv.png



8KISd.png


 
would have been nice to see some pro duo +furyx for trifire scaling, very limited benchmarks on the net with 3 fijis
 
DX12 looks to be Gameworks performance levels, all over again.

"To maintain 60 FPS in 1080p you do not need single GTX 980 Ti, now. You need two of them!"

🙂
 
Very interesting. There is not much difference between Duo and two FuryX's. You would think a single pcie lane for double Fiji could be not enough.

Other than that, nice 4k card. It certainly can push a lot of pixels.
 
The only really disappointing thing to me about the Pro Duo besides the obvious price issue is that they didn't use a removable fitting on the radiator that would allow it to be tied into an existing system or another rad to be added. The included cooling is probably the best reference CLLC system it's seen.
 
I really think the Duo would have been a monster if it could have been released within 90 days of the Fiji launch last year....really hard to justify this now though.
 
MrTeal said:
The only really disappointing thing to me about the Pro Duo besides the obvious price issue is that they didn't use a removable fitting on the radiator that would allow it to be tied into an existing system or another rad to be added. The included cooling is probably the best reference CLLC system it's seen.
Click to expand...


Why bother if you already have a loop and not get teh fullcover block?
 
exar333 said:
I really think the Duo would have been a monster if it could have been released within 90 days of the Fiji launch last year....really hard to justify this now though.
Click to expand...

For sure it would be better if AMD had released this card 6 months ago.
 
powerconsumption.png


Didn't another review show it using much less power? I'd be curious to see its power consumption (vs FuryX CF and 980ti sli) in Ashes DX12, as that seems to be able to saturate AMD cards the most.

Edit:

Here it is
ZwMEC.png
 
I ran Firestrike at regular, Extreme and Ultra on rig 2 below to give you a comparison of Graphics scores. Note first that the test bed for the scores above was a 6700k at stock. I'm running a 4790k @4.7 with 2 Sapphire Tri-X R9 290s, watercooled. but running stock 1000 core, 1300 memory in CF.

On to my graphics scores.

Regular 23,082; Extreme 10,106 and Ultra 5003.

Not bad for 2 Tri-X R9 290s CF stock.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top