hwbattleRadeon Pro Duo vs GTX 980TI SLI vs Fury X CF

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
C

csbin

Senior member
Feb 4, 2013
907
611
136
http://www.hwbattle.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=hottopic&wr_id=2040



12S1FM.jpg



N9kLE.png



bCFE6.png


JnQLE.png


Znusm.png


MajnL.png


ofovv.png



8KISd.png


 
M

Mars2jz

Junior Member
Mar 31, 2016
4
0
0
would have been nice to see some pro duo +furyx for trifire scaling, very limited benchmarks on the net with 3 fijis
 
Glo.

Glo.

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2015
5,930
4,991
136
DX12 looks to be Gameworks performance levels, all over again.

"To maintain 60 FPS in 1080p you do not need single GTX 980 Ti, now. You need two of them!"

:)
 
E

Erenhardt

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2012
3,251
105
101
Very interesting. There is not much difference between Duo and two FuryX's. You would think a single pcie lane for double Fiji could be not enough.

Other than that, nice 4k card. It certainly can push a lot of pixels.
 
moonbogg

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,731
3,440
136
Yeah that 295x2 is ridiculous how it keeps up with the new stuff. Just crazy and pretty awesome.
 
M

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,917
2,704
136
The only really disappointing thing to me about the Pro Duo besides the obvious price issue is that they didn't use a removable fitting on the radiator that would allow it to be tied into an existing system or another rad to be added. The included cooling is probably the best reference CLLC system it's seen.
 
exar333

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
I really think the Duo would have been a monster if it could have been released within 90 days of the Fiji launch last year....really hard to justify this now though.
 
thesmokingman

thesmokingman

Platinum Member
May 6, 2010
2,302
231
106
MrTeal said:
The only really disappointing thing to me about the Pro Duo besides the obvious price issue is that they didn't use a removable fitting on the radiator that would allow it to be tied into an existing system or another rad to be added. The included cooling is probably the best reference CLLC system it's seen.
Click to expand...


Why bother if you already have a loop and not get teh fullcover block?
 
M

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,917
2,704
136
thesmokingman said:
Why bother if you already have a loop and not get teh fullcover block?
Click to expand...

I never said it was a major concern. :)
Still, the VRM cooling on this one seems good enough that you don't need to buy a full cover block and fuss with installing it.
 
R

rainy

Senior member
Jul 17, 2013
522
453
136
exar333 said:
I really think the Duo would have been a monster if it could have been released within 90 days of the Fiji launch last year....really hard to justify this now though.
Click to expand...

For sure it would be better if AMD had released this card 6 months ago.
 
P

pj-

Senior member
May 5, 2015
501
278
136
powerconsumption.png


Didn't another review show it using much less power? I'd be curious to see its power consumption (vs FuryX CF and 980ti sli) in Ashes DX12, as that seems to be able to saturate AMD cards the most.

Edit:

Here it is
ZwMEC.png
 
guskline

guskline

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2006
5,338
476
126
I ran Firestrike at regular, Extreme and Ultra on rig 2 below to give you a comparison of Graphics scores. Note first that the test bed for the scores above was a 6700k at stock. I'm running a 4790k @4.7 with 2 Sapphire Tri-X R9 290s, watercooled. but running stock 1000 core, 1300 memory in CF.

On to my graphics scores.

Regular 23,082; Extreme 10,106 and Ultra 5003.

Not bad for 2 Tri-X R9 290s CF stock.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom