Hunt the Boeing! Test your eyes.

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
Why does it seem to be mainly Jr. members with only a few posts that

1) don't search
2) Seem to find this type of made up crap interesting?
 

Balthazar

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2000
1,834
0
0


<< Why does it seem to be mainly Jr. members with only a few posts that

1) don't search
2) Seem to find this type of made up crap interesting?
>>



Amen, normally I bitch when people reply with "repost" but this garbage just sucks....
 

A5

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2000
4,902
5
81
Yeah, the conspiricy dude forgets to think about the fact that the plane didn't hit the Pentagon proper, it appears to actually have hit the ground right in front of it, probably at an angle.
 

steveee

Junior Member
Nov 5, 2001
13
0
0
I just said it was interesting,I wasn't there so I don't know what happened and if you trust the news well I know of a good bridge for sale cheap .Please tell me of other links that show me different As a junior member I find that I learn a lot by listening so thank you for all replys an all the posts in anadtech forums. I have learn alot about Computing from all the posts.

Good day. Steve
 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
Why is it the Lifers or Lifer wannabes that always post that infantile repost?

I was serious in my second question, the most idiotic of the conspiracy riddled sites seem to always be posted by someone with at most 20 posts to their credit. I'm starting to think it's a conspiracy.
 

ThaGrandCow

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2001
7,956
2
0
I've seen this so many times. The plane disintegrated on impact. Why does there have to be a conspiracy theorist every time something happens?
 

steveee

Junior Member
Nov 5, 2001
13
0
0
Dear Bruno, Thank you for the link but have you seen any that show the scattered debris of the airplane again I just want to see most things from different viewpoints. Steve
 

Lucky

Lifer
Nov 26, 2000
13,126
1
0


<< Dear Bruno, Thank you for the link but have you seen any that show the scattered debris of the airplane again I just want to see most things from different viewpoints. Steve >>




Who is bruno?

And if you would read the previous threads about this it has already been discussed that a plane travelling 400+ mph slamming into the ground and then into a reinforced building doesnt leave much "debris".
 
Feb 24, 2001
14,513
4
81
I=teh Bruno

Anyway refer to the previous thread and you'll find pics that I posted showing why there would be little to no debris (large chunks anyway).
 

Derango

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2002
3,113
1
0


<< Dear Bruno, Thank you for the link but have you seen any that show the scattered debris of the airplane again I just want to see most things from different viewpoints. Steve >>



Steve, this exact same web site has been posted before, and not to long ago might I add. Thats what repost means.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
steveee - this site was posted a week ago and a big thread was made on it. as i said in that other thread, it is pretty much impossible to see little bits of twisted wreckage when each pixel of the photograph represents a couple of feet. also, if you look closely at the photographs, you can see where there is damage along the wingspan of the plane.
 

AndrewR

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,157
0
0
Lock this thread.

Apparently the moron who created that site doesn't understand the concept of a blast-reinforced building.