Gotta say - I am so sick of the 'biggest surplus' to 'biggest deficit' argument. How can anyone rational not adknowledge that we've had just a couple of devastating external events happen during his term. Anyone's guess as to how high the deficit would be with a different pres during that period, but it certainly would still be there...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.