• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Humanitarian situation in Iraq worsening: Red Cross

alien42

Lifer
link

"By Richard Waddington

GENEVA (Reuters) - The suffering of Iraqi civilians is worsening and there is no sign yet that a security crackdown in Baghdad is bringing relief, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said on Wednesday.

Hospitals were stretched to the limit by daily mass casualties, malnutrition was on the rise and power shortages were becoming more frequent around the country, the relief agency said.

"The humanitarian situation is steadily worsening and it is affecting, directly or indirectly, all Iraqis," the ICRC said.

Thousands of Iraqis continued to be forced out of their homes owing to military operations, generally poor security and the destruction of houses, it said.

All parties to the conflict, including coalition forces, needed to do more to protect ordinary people it said in a report called 'Civilians without Protection, the ever-worsening humanitarian crisis in Iraq'.

"The suffering that Iraqi men, women and children are enduring today is unbearable and unacceptable," Pierre Kraehenbuehl, director of operations for the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), told a news conference.

He said there was no indication yet the clampdown in Baghdad, launched in February by Iraqi and U.S.-led coalition forces, was improving the situation of civilians.

"We are not seeing a stabilizing effect yet," said the official, whose Swiss-based organization is one of the few humanitarian groups to have foreign staff in Iraq.

The report detailing ICRC operations gave no new figures on the humanitarian impact of the continuing violence, which began with the ousting of former President Saddam Hussein by coalition forces in 2003 and is being fuelled by sectarian rivalry.

But unemployment and hardship levels were rising, with an estimated one third of the population living in poverty and five percent in extreme poverty. Both the quantity and quality of drinking water was insufficient, despite some improvements, mainly in the south.

Doctors and nurses were fleeing the country in large numbers because of the murder and abduction of colleagues, leaving hospitals and other key services desperately short of qualified staff, the ICRC said.

According to the Iraqi Red Crescent, some 106,000 families, probably more than 600,000 people, have been driven from their homes to seek refuge elsewhere in Iraq since February 2006.

"The outlook is bleak, particularly in Baghdad and other areas with mixed communities, where the situation is likely to worsen," the ICRC warned."


we hear about the deaths of soldiers, road side bombs, etc but rarely do we here about the millions of innocent iraqis whose daily lives are negatively affected by this misguided war. if an iraqi said they wish saddam was back in power, i really could not blame them for feeling that way. so much for us using the money from oil revenues to rebuild the infrastructure of iraq, they do not even have enough clean water. and to think this article does not even go into the high number of civilian casualties of which we will never have an accurate count. i long for the days that the united states is once again making history that future generations can be proud of.
 
Hardly a surprise and if nothing else an understated but accurate assessment. If nothing else it implies that GWB&co. have put all their eggs in the wrong basket in Iraq. By trying to get a government for the people of Iraq while totally ignoring the people of Iraq and giving them four non-stop years of the Katrina treatment.

Contemporaneously, a new book is being published by an Alawi relative. A dreary four year chronicle of the history of US bungling and mis-management in Iraq. With somewhat a thesis that by 2007, the Iraqi people have just now finally totally lost all faith in the US led occupation. While I wonder if 2007
is accurate and that perhaps the Iraqi people lost all faith long ago, but it is certain that various Iraqis
at the street level have acted and boldly picked up the power just waiting to be seized. Again the book should come as no surprise, allegations of total bungling and mismanagement have been floating around for years. But now they are collected in one place and in somewhat a manefesto form.

The warning I sound is a resounding beware---history tells us that this can be a danger---look what one little book called Uncle Tom's Cabin did during the run up to our civil war----or what Rachel Carson's little book called the silent spring did for the environmental movement---once many people get on the same page and have something solid or even illusionary to rally around---it takes things into a totally new dimension where previous conventional wisdoms no longer operate.

The myth that the US Iraqi occupation is a United States decision with the options all decided by the US could crumble at any time---and with about the speed the Shah fell in Iran. And while Congress and the President battle it out to decide what to do about Iraq---with all the sound and fury this present war generates-------other events in Iraq and the mid-east could take new directions and make all these US battlegrounds totally irrelevant.
 
All I can say is take what the Red Cross says with a grain of salt - not because I don't believe that there is suffering in Iraq, but because I have first hand experience with the things that the Red Cross does during emergencies. I lived through Katrina. The eye passed over my family's home while we were inside of it. The hurricane was bad, but nothing compared to the aftermath of the weeks of no water, rationed gas (which was used to power a generator because there was also no electricity), no phones, and limited resources of any kind. The Red Cross finally showed up in our neighborhood 2 1/2 weeks afterwards, and we were in the front yard working to clean up the damage. They yelled out of a truck "You got any water?" as they drove through at about 20. Uh, if we didn't by now, we certainly wouldn't have been able to wait for you.

My family owns an auto repair business, and was one of the only ones able to open after the disaster. Not because we didn't get damage - we had 20 feet of water in the building, even though it still stood. We worked our behinds off getting the place back in order. We are on the Gulf Coast, which arguably got more damage than New Orleans but got little media attention because the people around here don't cry about it, they get busy. The Red Cross sent *several* vehicles to our business, received steep discounts for their "humanitarian efforts" in our area, and then promptly attempted to screw us by delaying payment, issuing PO's that practically took DNA evidence to process, and then delightfully took off 15% when we finally asked for a check due to "administrative costs". They had already received very steep discounts, and then took so much for "administrative fees" we ended up losing money by servicing their vehicles. And we were most definitely not the looters and idiots you saw on TV - we were part of the effort to survive through it and help the community. The interesting part of this tale is *how many* vehicles they sent for service. After a while it became very clear that they were trying to take advantage.

So while I'm sure that the Red Cross helps some people, they do not do it for free, and their "humanitarian efforts" and "reports on the crisis" also are used to market their fundraising. I feel for anyone in a crisis because the "helpers" often begin to feel entitled to help themselves to whatever those they "helped" have left.
 
Go read some of the reports coming out of Iraq during the 1990s when the UN sanctions were in full effect. You will see a similar picture.

link
According to that link over a million people died between 1990 and 2000 due to the sanctions. (I am guessing there is some major exaggeration going on in that report though.)

Another link
CommonDreams.org suggests that 500,000 children died due to the embargo, and a million people overall.

If these numbers are true then more people died in Iraq during the 1990s than have ded since the start of the war.
 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn


link
According to that link over a million people died between 1990 and 2000 due to the sanctions. (I am guessing there is some major exaggeration going on in that report though.)

Another link
CommonDreams.org suggests that 500,000 children died due to the embargo, and a million people overall.

If these numbers are true then more people died in Iraq during the 1990s than have ded since the start of the war.

Thanks for the perspective. That makes it all better now. NOw the only question is which is worse dying from torture, disease, poison gas under Saddam or dying from a car bomb or roving gangs of militia now.

 
Originally posted by: rudder
Originally posted by: ProfJohn


link
According to that link over a million people died between 1990 and 2000 due to the sanctions. (I am guessing there is some major exaggeration going on in that report though.)

Another link
CommonDreams.org suggests that 500,000 children died due to the embargo, and a million people overall.

If these numbers are true then more people died in Iraq during the 1990s than have ded since the start of the war.

Thanks for the perspective. That makes it all better now. NOw the only question is which is worse dying from torture, disease, poison gas under Saddam or dying from a car bomb or roving gangs of militia now.
I'm thinking that both suck.

That brings us to the next important question. If we leave Iraq will things get better or worse?
If we think things are bad now imagine how bad it will get during a full blown Shia-Sunni war.
 
Sadam had to be ruthless to keep and semblence of peace and stability. If people are not willing to fight for their own peace, then they do not deserve it.
 
Originally posted by: piasabird
Sadam had to be ruthless to keep and semblence of peace and stability. If people are not willing to fight for their own peace, then they do not deserve it.

The people are definitely fighting.... peace and stability may or may not come out of it eventually.
 
I won't slam the Red Crescent, but I will say that under Saddam, they had limited access to anywhere in Iraq. Now that they travel mostly free, they are able to see more and do more.

If you have one cop in New York City, the statistics will show low crime rate, and the one cop will not be able to see or do very much unless he is there when it happens. If you hire a thousand, the crime stats (and reporting) will go up alarmingly, though the same amount of crimes are going on. this is similar to what we here in Iraq are seeing with the Red Crescent. They have more staff and more opportunities to do good things, and they also recieve and process more reports.
 
Back
Top