There are takeovers, and then there are takeovers. If the PRC goes strongarm and launches a military invasion of Taiwan - an evert for which they have prepared for decades - then all bets are off. There is the very real possibility that TSMC may be the only leading-edge fab in the world at some point, if Intel and Samsung bow out of the race (or if Intel bows out and Samsung relegates themselves to specialty nodes). That will make them one hell of a strategic asset.TSMC is a public company and aside National Development Fund and Government of Singapore (accounting for ~9% as of 2018) essentially all big shareholders are western funds and institutions. Any institution can make a move at any stock market, but so far there hasn't been any indication "PRC" is doing that.
Imo the best way to prevent PRC attacking RoC/Taiwan/"Chinese Taipei" is exactly that reliance of big assumed government controlled companies on external companies there and elsewhere. The current attempted isolation of Huawei by the US severs those economic ties. If that approach doesn't stop but instead continues with other companies, and the reliance is not possible to fulfill internally then indeed all bets are off. At some point your scenario may well be more feasible that PRC's repeated tries at fostering globalization of its kind. But before that point PRC will try to get rid of all its US treasury bonds.There are takeovers, and then there are takeovers. If the PRC goes strongarm and launches a military invasion of Taiwan - an evert for which they have prepared for decades - then all bets are off. There is the very real possibility that TSMC may be the only leading-edge fab in the world at some point, if Intel and Samsung bow out of the race (or if Intel bows out and Samsung relegates themselves to specialty nodes). That will make them one hell of a strategic asset.
Huawei needs access to leading-edge fab technology, after all, and wars have been started over less.
If any of the PRCs investment arms start trying to buy up TSMC behind the scenes, I would expect most U.S. administrations to step in and try to stop it somehow.
It's obvious that SoftBank is not wanting to miss out on the licensing fees either. So the Chinese JV mentioned on the previous page likely accelerates the efforts of being able to license significant ARM IPs without the involvement of US designs.True, we'll just have to wait and see what the politicians do. In the meantime, it has become . . . more difficult for Huawei to produce ARM products. Honestly I didn't expect that. You pay the licensing fee, you make the product, and then politicians tell you where you can or can't sell said product, so you sell it somewhere else. Now you can't even pay the licensing fee?
Honestly I think the most diplomatic way to go about it would be to just let Huawei keep paying the licensing fee and keep iterating on their designs. It encourages them to maintain standards with the rest of the world. It also gives Huawei/HiSilicon a chance to continue advancing the state of the art in the ARM world, which is my interest.
It's custom, not (AFAIK) Cortex-A72-derived. There's no SVE today, but the Hi1630 roadmap lists SVE (and SMT!) in the 2020-2022 timeframe, so it's clearly on HiSilicon's radar.Good enough. We may see more versions of this 64c chip in the future, then. I'm sure plenty of people are interested in seeing SVE/SVE2 pop up in ARM server designs.
Does the Taishan v110 core support SVE? It's based on Cortex A72, apparently, but that's all I can figure out at a glance.
Each core features a single 128-bit NEON unit. It is capable of executing single double-precision FMA vector instruction per cycle or two single-precision vector instructions per cycle. Operating at 2 GHz, a 64-core chip will have a peak compute of 512 GigaFLOPS of double-precision floating point. It's worth noting that compared to the TaiShan v100, the throughput for single-precision vector has been doubled from 1 to 2 instructions per cycle.
If you read that carefully, you'll note that the "from A72" is referring to the comparison with the v100, which was semi-custom A72. Same for the "from 16nm" and the "from Gen 3" comments.@SarahKerrigan
The only info I could get on Taishan v110 was this:
It could have some wrong bits in there.
Oops, I also see from reading more that SVE is not supported. Under the ASIMD section:
In my opinion, Huawei were on the verge of actually making Samsung a bit more honest in their insane pricing for flagship phones - and now there is little to stop them raising prices further and further, so good luck if you don't have an inexhaustible source of income.RIP Huawei, I won't miss you.(Greeting from China)
Yes with other teams in Sophia-Antipolis (France), Cambridge (UK), and the other one that co-spawned the A65/E1 design (its location is on Anandtech somewhere).
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|I||Discussion Process shrink of Core 2 Duo?||CPUs and Overclocking||48|
|J||Question Two Intel Desktop CPUs: 2014-era Core i7 vs 2020 (current) Core i3?!||CPUs and Overclocking||9|
|S||Question how many cores||CPUs and Overclocking||2|
|Discussion The 64 core 200W EPYC 7702 runs cooler than the 3950x by 15C+....interesting results.||CPUs and Overclocking||10|
|S||News Huawei and ARM back in business?||CPUs and Overclocking||8|