http://www.anandtech.com/show/9102/the-htc-one-m9-review-part-1
qcom needs to get their 820 out stat on Samsung 14nm process.
qcom needs to get their 820 out stat on Samsung 14nm process.
SoC performance is a mild improvement over Snapdragon 805, and a significant improvement in GPU over Snapdragon 801. However, its definitely alarming at how small the differences are when Snapdragon 810 is placed in a phone, and it seems that the thermal output of the Snapdragon 810 is high enough that sustained tests end up placing it somewhere around the range of the Snapdragon 805 in CPU-bound tests. In GPU performance, the improvements over the Snapdragon 805s Adreno 420 are generally somewhat minimal, which really justifies HTCs decision to go with a 1080p display for the M9.
In our first few browser tests, we can see that the One M9 posts dramatically lower performance than the Snapdragon 810 MDP/T, which seems rather strange. However, using CPUBurn to try and load just a single thread reveals that without HTCs CPU cheats, its basically impossible to get the A57 cluster beyond 1.5 to 1.6 GHz
The first result that well look at is web browsing on WiFi. To say the least, the M9 posts a result that is a concerning regression from the M8 in this area. Although the One M9 does use the BCM4356 WiFi chipset, its highly unlikely that this is the reason why battery life regresses around 18% when the battery is now 9% bigger. Doing some quick calculations would mean that the M9 consumed about an average of 1.22 watts throughout the test. The M8 consumed about an average of .91 watts throughout the same test. This represents a 33% increase in power consumption that has to be accounted for