- May 18, 2001
- 2,215
- 6
- 81
I know this is unsolicited, but I just spent a few minutes playing with the new HTC Fuze (AT&T's version of the HTC Touch Pro) and Samsung Eternity in the AT&T store and thought I'd share my humble opinion. So far, I'm not at all impressed with the HTC Fuze, or at least this display model was bad. From my brief time with the device, the touch interface was slow and unresponsive and the display was almost monochromatic--pictures of the device show a vivid display; perhaps this is the dumbed-down AT&T version? Navigating in general seemed unintuitive, but that's a subjective opinion. The screen was sharp though, so that's a plus. I couldn't try the physical keyboard as AT&T's security zip ties wouldn't allow it to slide.
On the flip side, I am initially impressed by the Samsung Eternity. Touch response was fast and intuitive (again, subjective), and the pseudo-haptic behavior of the device was a nice touch--no pun intended. Screen was vivid and sharp and the various apps looked pretty decent for a non-smartphone device. One weird thing was that while the phone has an accelerometer to tell if it's in portrait or landscape mode, it doesn't seem to know which way it's been turned as the QWERTY keyboard shows up in landscape on the same side, regardless of the direction of rotation. The only real disappointing thing I found was the camera seemed crippled--test photos didn't appear sharp--not to mention that this is Samsung's dumbed-down sensor for AT&T (T-Mobile's Behold gets a 5 MP camera). This bugs the hell out of me--not because I value a camera in my phone, I don't--but the fact that this separation of cell providers causes these pointless, minute differentiations in the same devices.
Other than that, I was impressed by Samsung's device. My biggest worry is the fact that the OS is a proprietary Samsung OS as far as I've been told, so the availability of after-market apps may be sorely lacking, with no bright future for 3rd party development. The HTC Fuze offers WM 6.1, so there are a lot of apps there, but the performance seemed severely lacking to me.
I don't know if the aftermarket ROMs that have been discussed for the Touch Diamond exist for the Touch Pro nor if they provide a performance boost for the Touch Pro.
On the flip side, I am initially impressed by the Samsung Eternity. Touch response was fast and intuitive (again, subjective), and the pseudo-haptic behavior of the device was a nice touch--no pun intended. Screen was vivid and sharp and the various apps looked pretty decent for a non-smartphone device. One weird thing was that while the phone has an accelerometer to tell if it's in portrait or landscape mode, it doesn't seem to know which way it's been turned as the QWERTY keyboard shows up in landscape on the same side, regardless of the direction of rotation. The only real disappointing thing I found was the camera seemed crippled--test photos didn't appear sharp--not to mention that this is Samsung's dumbed-down sensor for AT&T (T-Mobile's Behold gets a 5 MP camera). This bugs the hell out of me--not because I value a camera in my phone, I don't--but the fact that this separation of cell providers causes these pointless, minute differentiations in the same devices.
Other than that, I was impressed by Samsung's device. My biggest worry is the fact that the OS is a proprietary Samsung OS as far as I've been told, so the availability of after-market apps may be sorely lacking, with no bright future for 3rd party development. The HTC Fuze offers WM 6.1, so there are a lot of apps there, but the performance seemed severely lacking to me.
I don't know if the aftermarket ROMs that have been discussed for the Touch Diamond exist for the Touch Pro nor if they provide a performance boost for the Touch Pro.