- Oct 10, 1999
- 70,670
- 6,246
- 126
Originally posted by: bamacre
This is why Dell went with AMD and introduced such products as the E521.
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: bamacre
This is why Dell went with AMD and introduced such products as the E521.
Dell was too little too late. By the time they realized AMD had a great CPU, Conroe came out. Now they're saying, "hey, we have this cool new processor!" And everyone is now saying, "who cares." If they would have switched as soon as AMD came out with their Athlon 64 processors, it would have been MUCH better timing. HP did the same thing. Again, too little, too late.
That aside, I prefer HP waaaay over Dell.
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: bamacre
This is why Dell went with AMD and introduced such products as the E521.
Dell was too little too late. By the time they realized AMD had a great CPU, Conroe came out. Now they're saying, "hey, we have this cool new processor!" And everyone is now saying, "who cares." If they would have switched as soon as AMD came out with their Athlon 64 processors, it would have been MUCH better timing. HP did the same thing. Again, too little, too late.
That aside, I prefer HP waaaay over Dell.
Originally posted by: Oyeve
HP is the better of the big 3. Not saying its good or anything, but they are the least suckiest.![]()