How's this for 3dmark2k1? :D

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
celeron 700, voodoo 5 pci (at 180mhz)

I get a massive 887 in 3dmark2001.. wow guys, wow.

Oh yeah, that's at 640x480 and 16-bit color too.

Josh
 

Rand

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
11,071
1
81
Something is seriously wrong with that.
A Voodoo Banshee paired with a Celeron 433 can do better then that at 640x480x16bpp.
 

Smbu

Platinum Member
Jul 13, 2000
2,403
0
0
I'm pretty sure my laptop can score higher than that.:D Something is wrong with your system.
BTW do you have a compare link?

"A Voodoo Banshee paired with a Veleron 433 can do better then that at 640x480x16bpp."

How good is that cpu and who makes it?:D
 

Rand

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
11,071
1
81


<<

"A Voodoo Banshee paired with a Veleron 433 can do better then that at 640x480x16bpp."

How good is that cpu and who makes it?:D
>>



Typo fixed. :)
 

damocles

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,105
5
81
Umm, you could get a higher score than that with a crayon and a few bits of paper. You should get more than that on the default settings. Didi you leave FSAA on?
 

bjc112

Lifer
Dec 23, 2000
11,460
0
76
dude, disable v-snyc, turn off FSSA... voodoo 5 score like 3-4 thousand.. on a t-bird 1.4 or so... you should get at least 2000+ that celly is the bottle neck
 

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
Which drivers are best for a Voodoo 5 on win2k? My current drivers won't allow me to disable v-sync.

Josh
 

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
Eh, just tried 3 different drivers, disabled v-sync in all of them.. got the same scores for all.. even when i changed it to 1024x768x32, still got about 880. Probably has to do with the fact that voodoo 5 doesn't have hardware T&L, so it's all done by the cpu.

Josh
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
30,783
28,252
146


<< Umm, you could get a higher score than that with a crayon and a few bits of paper >>

:D LOL
 

Rand

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
11,071
1
81


<< Eh, just tried 3 different drivers, disabled v-sync in all of them.. got the same scores for all.. even when i changed it to 1024x768x32, still got about 880. Probably has to do with the fact that voodoo 5 doesn't have hardware T&L, so it's all done by the cpu.

Josh
>>




Something is still seriously wrong. My old Voodoo Banshee on a Celeron 433MHz could score 700 at 1024x768x1024.
I have a Voodoo3 3000 here that could push almost 1300 in a Celery 433MHz in the same res/color depth.

Something is severely messed up if a V3 3000 paired with a Celeron 433MHz scores higher at 1024x768 then a V5 and a Celeron 700 can at 640x480.
 

marthafocker

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2001
13
0
0
hahahahhahaha...so low???...freak man...leave the settings to default when running 3dmark2k1...remember to turn off all goodies for vid card...overclock it to max...change everything to low priority in task manager...and set 3dkmark2k1.exe to realtime...that should get u some good shiet
 

Priit

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2000
1,337
1
0
Umm, last time I had windoze installed into my machine, I got about 900 3dmarks at lowest resolution with everything turned down on duron700 + Matrox G450.
 

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
Eh, I'm not messing with this too much.. I get to put together my new system after Christmas, with a Gainward gf3 ti200.. I'm sure that will be good enough. :)
Josh
 

Bozo Galora

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 1999
7,271
0
0


<<<Umm, you could get a higher score than that with a crayon and a few bits of paper.

HAHAHAH!!!!!




:D


 

Rand

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
11,071
1
81


<< Have to remember it's a pci voodoo 5 too, and I'm running windows 2000.

Josh
>>



Shouldnt have much of an impact. 3dfx was never big on AGP. The Voodoo5 took absolutely no advantage of any of AGP's advanced feature set. A Voodoo5 in an AGP slot was for all intents and purposes a PCI card in an AGP slot with a little more bandwidth. The PCI V5 performed almost identically to it's AGP counterpart... it was generally only a few frames/second slower.

As for running Windows 2000... well my tests on a V3/Celery 433 were also under Win2k.
 

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
I dunno what's up with my card... makes no sense that I'd only get 800-900 3dmarks with a card that cost me $200 about a year ago. :)

Josh
 

Uclagamer_99

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2000
2,867
1
76
my old rig... a p3-800EB and voodoo 5 AGP couldn't hit over 2000 if i remember correctly...it might have even been under 1500
 

DIRTsquirt

Senior member
Sep 13, 2001
424
0
0
Change your OS to win98se and your score will increase 30% win2k and 3dfx comes with a price...