howcome rolls royce arent Aerodynamic?

[Solodays]

it's like a box. maybe that 1000hp made up for the drag? ......🙁

 

[MotF Bane]

If you can afford a Rolls Royce, do you honestly give a fuck about fuel?

 

[Solodays]

im not talking about fuel.

 

[boomerang]

OK, so what's you're angle then? You don't like the styling or what?

Why is it important to you that a Rolls is aerodynamic?

Hurry with your answer please, because I'm on pins and needles wondering.

 

[StageLeft]

Probably doesn't look as good. Nobody really buys a rolls for fuel or for utmost performance, so...

 

[PottedMeat]

Originally posted by: Skoorb
Probably doesn't look as good. Nobody really buys a rolls for fuel or for utmost performance, so...

Yeah, I think the rolls demographic would rather have a integrated butler than high performance.

...maybe if it had a special aerodynamic bumper that shoos away poor people.

 

[krunchykrome]

when you've got 500HP, who needs aerodynamics

 

[sdifox]

You have to also consider rolls are generally not going at 100mph...

 

[BurnItDwn]

It's because a Rolls Royce is just like a bus, for a rich person.

Busses aren't aerodynamic, so therefore, a Rolls can't be either!

Busses have a bus driver, who drives along the route. If you own a Rolls, then you most likely hire a driver who drives along whatever route you choose....


So, this question is considered SOLVED. Rolls Royces can't be aerodynamic because they are a bus, and buses are not aerodynamic.



EDIT: In case anybody tries to argue with me and say that a rolls is more like a taxi, I will explain why they are incorrect and that a rolls is actually a bus.

In a bus, who opens the door for you? THE BUS DRIVER, that's who.
In a taxi, you generally open yoru own door.

In a Rolls, you're driver opens the door.

This should be enough concrete evidence to prove once and for all, why Rolls Royce cars are not aerodynamic.!

 

[TehMac]

If I had a Rolls, I'd drive it myself. It's more fun that way, fuck a driver. I'd get a limo for that.

 

[coldmeat]

Originally posted by: TehMac
If I had a Rolls, I'd drive it myself. It's more fun that way, fuck a driver. I'd get a limo for that.

If I wanted to drive myself, I wouldn't get a Rolls.

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: coldmeat

Originally posted by: TehMac
If I had a Rolls, I'd drive it myself. It's more fun that way, fuck a driver. I'd get a limo for that.

If I wanted to drive myself, I wouldn't get a Rolls.

I know someone who owns a Rolls and he drives it himself.

 

[Mide]

It's all about lux...nothing else matters including aerodynamics.

 

[TehMac]

Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

Originally posted by: coldmeat

Originally posted by: TehMac
If I had a Rolls, I'd drive it myself. It's more fun that way, fuck a driver. I'd get a limo for that.

If I wanted to drive myself, I wouldn't get a Rolls.

I know someone who owns a Rolls and he drives it himself.

Yea me too haha. I wonder if we know the same person...well I don't know him, but I see him driving around areas I frequent a lot in a white rolls with a dog chilling half out the window.

 

[Kadarin]

Originally posted by: Mide
It's all about lux...nothing else matters including aerodynamics.

Listening to James May talk about a Rolls Royce Phantom they reviewed on Top Gear, I'd say this is the correct answer. Rolls cares about style, luxury, and comfort, period.

 

[BassBomb]

That is like asking why a Hummer is not fuel efficient...idiot

 

[jtvang125]

Originally posted by: BurnItDwn
It's because a Rolls Royce is just like a bus, for a rich person.

Busses aren't aerodynamic, so therefore, a Rolls can't be either!

Busses have a bus driver, who drives along the route. If you own a Rolls, then you most likely hire a driver who drives along whatever route you choose....


So, this question is considered SOLVED. Rolls Royces can't be aerodynamic because they are a bus, and buses are not aerodynamic.



EDIT: In case anybody tries to argue with me and say that a rolls is more like a taxi, I will explain why they are incorrect and that a rolls is actually a bus.

In a bus, who opens the door for you? THE BUS DRIVER, that's who.
In a taxi, you generally open yoru own door.

In a Rolls, you're driver opens the door.

This should be enough concrete evidence to prove once and for all, why Rolls Royce cars are not aerodynamic.!

I'd have to disagree. I think it's more in line of a limo.😛

 

[rh71]

Originally posted by: krunchykrome
when you've got 500HP, who needs aerodynamics

When you have other people driving you around, do you care how fast the car can move? Such a waste. If I were rich the last thing I'd want would be to get driven around my phatty ride by someone else.