Originally posted by: yosuke188
I thought viruses continued to change and work around the immune system.
DING DING DING... tell him what he has won Johnny 😉
Originally posted by: yosuke188
I thought viruses continued to change and work around the immune system.
Originally posted by: dullard
A virus is simply a rouge piece of DNA. DNA that was once from a living organism, but broke free and continues to trick other living organisms to replicate the virus DNA. The cell eventually breaks, the virus DNA escapes, and the whole process repeats.Originally posted by: Shawn
But if it's not alive than what is it?
One could argue that viruses are a bit more than just DNA though. A virus also needs protection. So the virus tricks the cell to produce a 1+ protein(s) that provide a shell for the virus.
Hmm, a virus is just like a forwarded email. The email is just data (DNA is just data). The email tricks people to copy it, then tricks them to send the copies out to other victims.
Personally, I don't think the understanding of prions is very far along yet. Many theories about prions may be wrong. But the current idea is that a prion is just a malformed protein - not even DNA. This protein "tricks" other proteins to reshape themselves into the same misshapen prion form. Then like a pyramid scheme, more and more misshaped proteins transform other normal shaped proteins into misshapen ones.Originally posted by: DaShen
Aren't prions the same thing as Viruses except without the protein shell?
Originally posted by: dullard
Personally, I don't think the understanding of prions is very far along yet. Many theories about prions may be wrong. But the current idea is that a prion is just a malformed protein - not even DNA. This protein "tricks" other proteins to reshape themselves into the same misshapen prion form. Then like a pyramid scheme, more and more misshaped proteins transform other normal shaped proteins into misshapen ones.Originally posted by: DaShen
Aren't prions the same thing as Viruses except without the protein shell?
Originally posted by: dullard
So do robots - they replicate (not yet by their own capacity) and they are always being improved (evolving). So does that mean robots are alive?Originally posted by: MagicConch
I've heard this frequently and I don't doubt it is true, but I don't understand. They replicate (if not through their own capacity), & they evolve when necessary. Why are they not considered alive? Is it because they need a host to replicate?
I don't know what your particular definition of life is. Many people think life includes common functions as: reproduction (can make more of itself through its own capacity), metabolism (eats food and/or uses energy), and responds to stimuli (any response at all). Viruses have none of those three.
Originally posted by: yellowfiero
For a virus then to be classified as alive it must:
* Reproduce - viruses don't reproduce like normal cells
* Obtain and use energy - viruses don't eat
* Grow, develop, and die - viruses don't grow
* Respond to the environment - viruses can't move or respond