Originally posted by: dug777
I'd be interested in seeing the fps gain in a newer game, especially the minimums?
You might find it marginally worth it? A few fps in a marginal zone is often the difference between playable and unplayable![]()
less than marginally worth it
my CPU has a *real* OC ... from 1.8Ghz to 2.81Ghz ... with *noticeable* performance increases
OTOH, the x1950p manages to go from 580 to 608 on the core and scores +200 marks in 10K ... or +2% "performance gain"
after dealing with Sapphire's Brain-Dead RMA people, i would not want to take *any chance* -- for only 2 percent - of encountering them again
[although that would *force* an upgrade to GTX or HD-XT]
:Q
so far ... *nothing* with my x1950p is "marginal" ... it runs STALKER with *everything* absolutely maxed in game over 30 FPS ...
letsee +2% might give me +0.5 FPS increase ... if it isn't already limited by my CPU
i won't get ANY more "details"
NOT "worth it" - imo
i'd rather OC my CPU further - or lower details
-OR
much better
buy a NEW GPU when i am dissatisfied with my current one
============
and Paratus, yes, your CPU does hold you back ...
however, if you OC your CPU or GPU too much - at the "edge" of instability -
you 3DMarkXX score may go down
i OC'd my CPU beyond stability ... and got a lower 3DMark06 score ... that's when i *settled* on 2.81Ghz for my e4300 ... i can get much higher with a better MB