Originally posted by: Homerboy
WHOAH! First learn to resize before you post online...
2ndly I dunno
Yes, really. Learn how to use Photoshop's "Image Size" and "Save for Web" commands... :frown:
Originally posted by: yobarman
lighting lighting lighting! you can't take a professional pic with the flash on a camera, you have to set up lights around your subject for better looking photos
Seconded. There's a reason that any good wedding photographer uses a Stroboframe or equivalent flash bracket. Not to mention that studio photographers don't use any on-camera flash at all.
Originally posted by: OulOat
Make the aperature bigger only the bunny will be in focus. Also, b&w is the only way to go.
With the consumer digital camera that he's probably using (I didn't take time to download his freaking huge JPEG on my dialup connection to see the EXIF info), the sensor will be so small that even at a narrow (zoomed in) perspective and a wide aperture, he's not going to get much depth of field because the lens itself will still have a very short focal length compared to 35mm or APS-format digital.
In this case, finding a non-distracting background will help a lot if you can't do much about the DOF. Consider plain colored sheets, poster boards, etc for backgrounds. Either that or something natural, like the side of a bush (green anything goes well with wildlife).
Also, I disagree about the B&W comment, but sometimes it can look better than a color photo, depending on the subject (I certainly don't think it's the "only way to go" all of the time). Anyway, if you want a B&W photo, shoot it in color in the camera, and then use Photoshop's Channel Mixer in Monochrome mode to do your B&W conversion, so you get the effect of B&W color filters, even without having any on the camera at the time of exposure.