- May 18, 2001
- 7,860
- 353
- 126
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Oh lets face it, Terminator 3 and parts of 2 already ruined that franchise.
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Oh lets face it, Terminator 3 and parts of 2 already ruined that franchise.
Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Oh lets face it, Terminator 3 and parts of 2 already ruined that franchise.
Negative.
T3 was what ruined it. T2 was better than T1.
Originally posted by: NuclearNed
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Oh lets face it, Terminator 3 and parts of 2 already ruined that franchise.
I agree with the 3 part, but personally can't find anything wrong with 2.
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Oh lets face it, Terminator 3 and parts of 2 already ruined that franchise.
Negative.
T3 was what ruined it. T2 was better than T1.
I wouldn't say T3 ruined it. Sure, it wasn't up to the other two, but it was still entertaining. T3 didn't add anything to the story or timeline, so it really had no point in being made, but at least they didn't totally screw it up (say, not having Arnold in it, etc.).
A TV series will definitely ruin it though, as would any more sequels.
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Oh lets face it, Terminator 3 and parts of 2 already ruined that franchise.
Negative.
T3 was what ruined it. T2 was better than T1.
I wouldn't say T3 ruined it. Sure, it wasn't up to the other two, but it was still entertaining. T3 didn't add anything to the story or timeline, so it really had no point in being made, but at least they didn't totally screw it up (say, not having Arnold in it, etc.).
A TV series will definitely ruin it though, as would any more sequels.