And? What do you infer or conclude from this? OK -- I'll look at the link, but my time is limited. The source is worth investigating for content.
Without exploring further, I would suggest that election processes are more carefully watched and administered north of the Mexican border.
COMING BACK. OK!
If he were 60 or 70 years old, I can imagine him working with certain people I've come to understand intimately -- people like Dave Phillips. And like either of Phillips' protégés (the second was a young man named Michael Townley . . . you do what research you want to further this understanding) -- like those protégés, Sepulveda fits like a glove. But he's only what? -- 31?
Here's something I find of interest:
“My job was to do actions of dirty war and psychological operations, black propaganda, rumors—the whole dark side of politics that nobody knows exists but everyone can see,”
I'd have to dredge up the document. It was one of the Clinton-era declassifications: A memo from Phillips as "Chief of the Western Hemisphere" in CIA to all the operatives in Chile, to use "psych__ operations, black propaganda" and "pull out all stops!" in the overthrow of Salvadore Allende.
That was another era. But it simply points up what I've been saying through the last several post-911 campaigns I've seen.
It's almost such bizarre topic, people either seem clueless or incredulous about it and unable to grasp your meaning. I'd say only part of that is a failure of an Individual-centric culture for people to be aware that they're simply part of various mass-psychologies. "I can't be fooled! I'm an individual!"
So when we hear arguments in recent days from Sean Spicer or Alice Stewart or Kellyann Conway and even Trump himself, they seem to be speaking to people who would find the topic hard to grasp, making an argument at such a low and silly level that it obscures the actual reality.
Facebook
Twitter