How The GOP May Change It's Tone, Due To An Improving Economy

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
But the Republican obstructionism denied government the capacity to perform any of it's job creating duties...

or at least that was msnbc's message up until today...

;)
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
But the Republican obstructionism denied government the capacity to perform any of it's job creating duties...

or at least that was msnbc's message up until today...

;)

Well sure. As we can see on this forum alone, and good news on the economy is all praises for Obama. Any bad news and it is Republican obstructionism. Just like Obamacare. Any good news and it's all praises for Obama. Any bad news is it was originally a Republican idea.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
How about for not losing 800K jobs/month, unlike predecessor
When his term is done, there's going to be lots of jobs lost.

Starting with oil and gas. He never did approve the keystone pipeline.

Nuclear Energy, he promised he was going there, he never went there.

What he has done is promote socialism, and socialized medicine. Promote useless alternative energies, like Solar, and Wind Power.

The only winners under Obama's regime, were Government employees.

Same as when Hillary Clinton runs. Socialism. Communism.

Are we going to spread the 1 trillion dollars in debt we have gained this year between us?

What's 1 Trillion Dollars, divided by 400 Million people?

-John
 
Last edited:

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,217
14,900
136
When his term is done, there's going to be lots of jobs lost.

Starting with oil and gas. He never did approve the keystone pipeline.

Nuclear Energy, he promised he was going there, he never went there.

What he has done is promote socialism, and socialized medicine. Promote useless alternative energies, like Solar, and Wind Power.

The only winners under Obama's regime, were Government employees.

Same as when Hillary Clinton runs. Socialism. Communism.

Are we going to spread the 1 trillion dollars in debt we have gained this year between us?

What's 1 Trillion Dollars, divided by 400 Million people?

-John

Are you trolling? I'm pretty sure not one thing you said was factual and in fact is the opposite.


Time for your meds buddy, or stop drinking.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,217
14,900
136
When his term is done, there's going to be lots of jobs lost.

Starting with oil and gas. He never did approve the keystone pipeline.
Oh noes! 50 permanent jobs won't get created!
http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...anada-ceo-says-42000-keystone-xl-pipeline-jo/


Nuclear Energy, he promised he was going there, he never went there.

Oh he went there! Three times in fact!
http://www.politifact.com/florida/s...says-he-supported-first-nuclear-power-plant-/


What he has done is promote socialism, and socialized medicine. Promote useless alternative energies, like Solar, and Wind Power.

You have no idea what socialism is!

http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision...ialism-makes-sense-analysis/story?id=20435162

Clean energy creating jobs and profit:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/subsidized-energy-success-after-solyndra



The only winners under Obama's regime, were Government employees.

Federal job growth declining:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...nment-shrinking-after-period-of-rapid-growth/


Same as when Hillary Clinton runs. Socialism. Communism.

Since you don't even know what socialism is, I'll just ignore this tripe.

Are we going to spread the 1 trillion dollars in debt we have gained this year between us?

What's 1 Trillion Dollars, divided by 400 Million people?

I'll give you this one as explaining to you the circumstances for this increase would be pointless to someone like you.



-John



In closing, how about you fuck off, troll!


You reported the post below and we acted, but here in your post just above, your "f*ck-based" attack, separate from your more substantive response, prompted that poster's response. Fair is fair.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Fuck off, ivwshane. All you do is hate. You are a fucking troll.

-John


Your post is nothing but an attack, with excessive vitriol.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
To what, my own post?

I already posted.

You, like ivwshane, on the other hand, attacked, out of the blue.

I'm supposed to congratulate him, on his crying post? Trying to salvage some semblance of humanity?

-John
 
Last edited:

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,398
6,077
126
Where I get lost is in trying to figure out how having standards of food purity for catsup leads to slavery. They still let you grind up some tomato worms in it I think. I really don't want my catsup to be made from rotten tomatoes picked from the ground. And I don't want my neighbors switching to brand Y because I died from using brand X. Are you sure, Zorkorist, you're not like a religious fanatic that thinks there just one way to get to heaven?
 
Nov 8, 2012
20,828
4,777
146
In closing, how about you fuck off, troll!

IWShane, do you know what "government shrinking after period of rapid growth" means?

That means initially the government grew to a FUCKING GIANT GARGANTUAN RATE thanks to our current dictator-in-chief. And now, it's going down ever so slightly.

Do you realize how retarded you sound?

2007: 1,618
2008: 1,673
2009: 1,757
2010: 1,832
2011: 1,857
2012: 1,850 <--- Oh look!! It's going down!! OBLAMA IS HELPING TEH ECONOMY!!!!
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
In closing, how about you fuck off, troll!

So he never did approve the keystone pipeline and the number of government employees grew quite a bit under Obama’s. I guess we have different definitions of what "not one thing you said was factual" would be.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
IWShane, do you know what "government shrinking after period of rapid growth" means?

That means initially the government grew to a FUCKING GIANT GARGANTUAN RATE thanks to our current dictator-in-chief. And now, it's going down ever so slightly.

Do you realize how retarded you sound?

2007: 1,618
2008: 1,673
2009: 1,757
2010: 1,832
2011: 1,857
2012: 1,850 <--- Oh look!! It's going down!! OBLAMA IS HELPING TEH ECONOMY!!!!

Did you expect him to actually read and understand what he linked to? That less than 1% decline "After a period of rapid growth during President Obama’s first term" clearly shows federal employment is down under Obama.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,217
14,900
136
IWShane, do you know what "government shrinking after period of rapid growth" means?

That means initially the government grew to a FUCKING GIANT GARGANTUAN RATE thanks to our current dictator-in-chief. And now, it's going down ever so slightly.

Do you realize how retarded you sound?

2007: 1,618
2008: 1,673
2009: 1,757
2010: 1,832
2011: 1,857
2012: 1,850 <--- Oh look!! It's going down!! OBLAMA IS HELPING TEH ECONOMY!!!!

Did you expect him to actually read and understand what he linked to? That less than 1% decline "After a period of rapid growth during President Obama’s first term" clearly shows federal employment is down under Obama.


Try again! Maybe this time you can do your own research Matt;)

http://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-REB-28985

Not since July 1966 has the federal government’s workforce been so small. (The spikes every decade are the hiring of several hundred thousand temporary workers to conduct the census.) Federal government hiring climbed in the 1960s, moved sideways in the 1970s, climbed to the highest level ever outside of a census in the 1980s, declined in the 1990s and then again held steady for most of the 2000s.

I'm sure you'd like to blame Obama for the rise in government workers at the state level though, but that's because you are dishonest.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,751
3,068
121
Where I get lost is in trying to figure out how having standards of food purity for catsup leads to slavery. They still let you grind up some tomato worms in it I think. I really don't want my catsup to be made from rotten tomatoes picked from the ground. And I don't want my neighbors switching to brand Y because I died from using brand X. Are you sure, Zorkorist, you're not like a religious fanatic that thinks there just one way to get to heaven?

This whole thread seems a bit like a GOP rant, somewhat :)

;)
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0

Yawn.

You mean like the double and triple dip recessions Righthadists kept screaming about these past few years? Which is legit, right? Because their cousin's neighbor's daughter's co-worker use to work with a guy that once lived in a city, where he had a friend that had a sister who was let go from their jerb in '10, '11, '12 & '13?

Yawn and stretch.

The Right has been wrong, many many many times. The Right is right in being wrong (which is pretty damn frequent).

Also, please toss out the anecdotal BS as well as the purported doom and gloom. I understand sensationalism crap is the Right's butter and bread (oh noes, teh Deth Panelz!!!shift+1!!, oh noes, teh economonies!!), but, it just makes you look defective.

Have your leadership come up with alternatives, like this article suggests. There is actually some good advice in there. However, it DOES mean your elected conservative leadership will actually have to work, instead of refuse to work (which is also in their dossier).

But, we all know how these next few years will pan out;
- dismissing & downplay anything good attributed to Barry, because it's not that important (saving lives with affordable healthcare,.. meh.)
- block any attempts by Barry, for anything, even if its on something past conservative leadership was keen on (i.e. immigration reform)
- vilify anything that he does (i.e. lawsuits and executive orders are illegal (which were proven they are not and even accepted; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/18/federalist-society-obama-immigration_n_6182350.html - what a joke, especially the herp a derps who threw a shit fit over this on these very forums))
- throw their hands up when asked to indeed provide alternatives and help (b-b-but we don't need big governments!!)
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
Yawn.

You mean like the double and triple dip recessions Righthadists kept screaming about these past few years? Which is legit, right? Because their cousin's neighbor's daughter's co-worker use to work with a guy that once lived in a city, where he had a friend that had a sister who was let go from their jerb in '10, '11, '12 & '13?

Yawn and stretch.

The Right has been wrong, many many many times. The Right is right in being wrong (which is pretty damn frequent).

Also, please toss out the anecdotal BS as well as the purported doom and gloom. I understand sensationalism crap is the Right's butter and bread (oh noes, teh Deth Panelz!!!shift+1!!, oh noes, teh economonies!!), but, it just makes you look defective.

A lot of those screams about a double dip recession were from the left fear mongering about the sequestration.