If you want to sell a house, and have the buyer, how would you do it - who would you use for the paperwork and what would the normal price be? I'm assuming different than an agent @6%.
lol I think they are at 7% here. Thankfully, I am not moving until I'm dead or headed to assisted living.also any agent charging 6% is a crook. Do not hire an agent that charges 6%.
also any agent charging 6% is a crook. Do not hire an agent that charges 6%.
that is balls to the wall nuts. I would never ever hire an agent that took more than 4%. When I sold my house (at 4%) the agent had a buyer in place before the sign went in the yard. Literally, the offer was signed and done before the sign was in the yard. There's absolutely no need for an expensive realtor when the market is moving so fast that your head spins.6% is the traditional number and has nothing to do with being a crook or not. Times are a changing in some areas of the country and 5% is becoming the norm. I know plenty of ethical listing agents that go for 6% when getting a new listing. And they are very good at what they do. Around here most payouts to the buyers agent is 2.5%. Some not so great buyers agents may lower the priority of a property that has a 2% payout. I've never seen anything less than 2% though on the buyers side. The vast majority of buyers payouts are 2.5%, which means the sellers agents got at least a 5% commission.
that is balls to the wall nuts. I would never ever hire an agent that took more than 4%. When I sold my house (at 4%) the agent had a buyer in place before the sign went in the yard. Literally, the offer was signed and done before the sign was in the yard. There's absolutely no need for an expensive realtor when the market is moving so fast that your head spins.
ha, nope. I'd believe maybe 5k at most. We listed at more than what our agent suggested at my insistence. We lived in the house for 3 years and made 20% off the sale in a small town.If you live in an insanely hot market, which I do, you could probably do a 4% commission deal, but it just rarely happens. There is just too much fluctuation - the majority of properties sit for a month or less depending upon the cost - but others sit a lot longer. Most people want to pay the 1% extra to get professional service.
You might have been able to get an extra $30,000 while paying out an extra $3k in commission.
Can you check the county records for recent sales? Ours is online and pretty nifty.
You as the lender because they can't get a loan...I'd have to really like/trust them for it to be under 8%.
I've had rentals and have seen what people can do to a place. And what it costs to fix.Why, when it's secured by the property?
If they don't pay, they lose it - still profitable.
that is balls to the wall nuts. I would never ever hire an agent that took more than 4%. When I sold my house (at 4%) the agent had a buyer in place before the sign went in the yard. Literally, the offer was signed and done before the sign was in the yard. There's absolutely no need for an expensive realtor when the market is moving so fast that your head spins.
If you want to sell a house, and have the buyer, how would you do it - who would you use for the paperwork and what would the normal price be? I'm assuming different than an agent @6%.
this seems like its completely at odds with what I was saying (noting that I am both "not really understanding" and "seem to have some inkling" in the same paragraph), and the judgement on whether or not I was "right" to use a realtor at 4% in a hot market is completely unnecessary - particularly when you follow that up with a full paragraph describing the exact reasons why I used a realtor in the first place. I paid 4% to my agent. I was selling a house for the first time. What's it to you?You seem to be awfully snarky for not really understanding what you're talking about. The seller's agent typically takes a 6% commission in most areas of the country because the buyer's agent is paid through that commission. In other words, the prototypical arrangement is for the agents to split what the seller agrees to pay. People often confuse this by thinking they don't have to pay for a real estate agent as the buyer, but that's not true because the seller is far less willing to come down on price when they are stuck with a 6% commission. You seem to have some inkling of how this works, but you should be a little less aggressive and sarcastic until you actually understand.
I have been buying and selling properties for a long time without a realtor. The very first time I bought a house I used a realtor, but that's before I figured out how the process works. For some people, I will always tell them to use a realtor because they think they're smart enough to handle it when they aren't. If you can do basic math and have some semblance of fiscal responsibility, you can handle it on your own. Using an agent takes the guess work out if you aren't sure which person you are or if you don't have any experience. Just because the market is hot doesn't mean you can't step on a landmine that totally fucks you later. It's the same thing as basically everything else - if you don't know what you don't know, you won't know when it's going to bite you in the ass.
Edit: Also, if the market was that hot, you could have sold it on your own. You paid a pair of realtors 4% to walk across your lawn a few times and to print a contract. That is balls to the wall nuts.
If you want to sell a house, and have the buyer, how would you do it - who would you use for the paperwork and what would the normal price be? I'm assuming different than an agent @6%.
I just took a job as a realtor, PM some info and we can talk. I can look for a well rated realtor in your area.
