marcplante
Senior member
I'm a general computer user who does the following things.
general srufing
Occasional gaming, including
GTR2 (driving SIM)
COD WAW2
I anticipate BF3 in my future After I buy a new graphics card.
I do occasional large file transfers
I had 4 G of memory (in my sig) and just added 8 G of faster memory. I now have 12 G of memory. The faster memory is restricted by my BUS spd (1333 Mhz) and the slower memory is running at 1066 Mhz. (something like that. I'm not that technical actually).
Is 8 G enough if I'm not multitasking? Do I just leave in the extra 4 G of "old" RAM. My thinking is the response speed isn't material and that I benefit more from capacity than throughput. i haven't found a contemporary article that covers this well. There was a Toms hardware piece from 2005 that talked about going from 512kMb - 2G. It focused on multitasking and file transfers as well as some stability of FPS on certain games.
thanks,
Marc
thoughts?
general srufing
Occasional gaming, including
GTR2 (driving SIM)
COD WAW2
I anticipate BF3 in my future After I buy a new graphics card.
I do occasional large file transfers
I had 4 G of memory (in my sig) and just added 8 G of faster memory. I now have 12 G of memory. The faster memory is restricted by my BUS spd (1333 Mhz) and the slower memory is running at 1066 Mhz. (something like that. I'm not that technical actually).
Is 8 G enough if I'm not multitasking? Do I just leave in the extra 4 G of "old" RAM. My thinking is the response speed isn't material and that I benefit more from capacity than throughput. i haven't found a contemporary article that covers this well. There was a Toms hardware piece from 2005 that talked about going from 512kMb - 2G. It focused on multitasking and file transfers as well as some stability of FPS on certain games.
thanks,
Marc
thoughts?