• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

how much of a difference will i see going from a 1.73GHz to 2GHZ processor?

BooGiMaN

Diamond Member
I am considering a dell 9300 laptop but not sure how much of a difference if any there would be going from a 1.73GHz to a 2.0 GHZ processor

will i see a difference during gaming? i plan to get the 6800 GO video card as well

im a newbie when it comes to laptops...what do these processor speeds translate into in terms of a desktop?
 
Not much. Your video card will be the bottleneck, as A 1.73 GHZ pentium M will perform at around a 2.0-2.2GHZ AMD Venice in gaming. The 6800GO will be the bottleneck.
 
I have the 1.86 in the 9300..runs great...i dont think the 1.73 will hurt you much. If you tight on money I say save it since you are getting the go 6800...oh ya...make sure you get 1 gig of memory ...if its now or later, get it.
 
I'd install the memory yourself. Dell charges far too much for RAM, and you get a lifetime warranty if you buy it from NewEgg.
A 6800GT and a 1.73ghz Pentium-M looks to be a good setup if you're on a budget.
 
Where did you get the idea that a 1.73 p-m equals a 2.0-2.2 amd in gaming? Every direct benchmark I've seen shows that the turion beats the p-m clock for clock in gaming benchmarks. Infact, they are pretty even clock for clock in most every benchmark that I can find.

Turion vs. P-M in gaming
 
Originally posted by: kenan921
Where did you get the idea that a 1.73 p-m equals a 2.0-2.2 amd in gaming? Every direct benchmark I've seen shows that the turion beats the p-m clock for clock in gaming benchmarks. Infact, they are pretty even clock for clock in most every benchmark that I can find.

Turion vs. P-M in gaming


I wholeheartedly agree; the Turion is a better processor.
On the other hand, I've yet to see a Turion notebook with a 6800.
 
I agree, if you are looking for a gaming notebook, you have no choice but to go the p-m route. I was just replying to earlier post which claimed that the p-m in and of itself made a notebook superior to an amd based solution. Without question the best gaming laptop deal out there is a dell 9300 w/ 6800 go.
 
Originally posted by: kenan921
Where did you get the idea that a 1.73 p-m equals a 2.0-2.2 amd in gaming? Every direct benchmark I've seen shows that the turion beats the p-m clock for clock in gaming benchmarks. Infact, they are pretty even clock for clock in most every benchmark that I can find.

Turion vs. P-M in gaming

Every benchmark you see?

For some reason, the laptoplogic.com benchmark gets linked over and over. There have been several other benchmarks where the opposite is true. The Pentium-M also has lower power consumption at load. While I wouldnt say a 1.73 is equal to a 2.0-2.2 A64, I'd say its equivalent to A64's at the same clock speed.
 
to the owners of the 9300 inspiron. I was thinking of getting one for gaming but also for work. How is the battery life vs a 15.4 version in non gaming situation. etc
thanks
 
Originally posted by: dexvx
Every benchmark you see?

For some reason, the laptoplogic.com benchmark gets linked over and over. There have been several other benchmarks where the opposite is true. The Pentium-M also has lower power consumption at load. While I wouldnt say a 1.73 is equal to a 2.0-2.2 A64, I'd say its equivalent to A64's at the same clock speed.
What other benchmarks? GamePC.com? i.e. The company that writes product reviews on the products they SELL. I'm sorry but their Turion vs P-M article was complete garbage.

The fact of the matter is that P-M's and A64's are pretty fairly matched. One will outperform the other in some scenarios, and vice versa. What I tell people is that you can't go wrong with either one, but a big thing to keep in mind is that there are a LOT more Pentium M notebook configurations than there are Turion's. Realistically, I say find a notebook based on all the OTHER parameters that matter to you (Size, weight, screen size, price, etc) and see what your CPU options are then. I've seen a lot of people post "I want a Turion laptop with super bejeebus X928130 graphics card." Well, considering AMD doesn't want Turion seen as another DTR CPU, you're gonna be hard pressed to find such a machine. I tell people to get a Pentium M with a decent GPU and they go "Awww nahhh Intel suckz0rz for gaming." You'd think I was pulling the wool over their eyes or something...
 
Originally posted by: kenan921
I agree, if you are looking for a gaming notebook, you have no choice but to go the p-m route. I was just replying to earlier post which claimed that the p-m in and of itself made a notebook superior to an amd based solution. Without question the best gaming laptop deal out there is a dell 9300 w/ 6800 go.

uhh...XPS w/7800 Go

 
Back
Top