***Merry Christmas***
I was just looking at Crucial's Web page that recommends memory amounts for different system configurations. In case you haven't seen it, you choose your mobo, processor, OS, and a benchmark test; then you get a graph that shows how that system performed in Crucial's benchmark trials. They didn't have my mobo listed, so I had to approximate. The horizontal bar graph for that system made it look like 512MB blew away 256MB by a factor of four, but looking closely at the figures showed 256MB scoring a 3D Mark2001 12333, and the 512MB scoring 12478. In other words, the graph is scaled in a way that makes 140 points in the 12000 range look devastating. So, at least according to 3D Mark 2001 scores, 256MB is the better value. Am I missing something?
Here's the system I'm building:
2500+
Via KM400 mobo
GF4 Ti 4x00 or 9600 Pro
Fortissimo II
XP Home
I do a lot of Web surfing, some gaming at fairly standard settings, listen to music, and watch DVDs. Is it worth it for me to buy 512MB PC2700?
I was just looking at Crucial's Web page that recommends memory amounts for different system configurations. In case you haven't seen it, you choose your mobo, processor, OS, and a benchmark test; then you get a graph that shows how that system performed in Crucial's benchmark trials. They didn't have my mobo listed, so I had to approximate. The horizontal bar graph for that system made it look like 512MB blew away 256MB by a factor of four, but looking closely at the figures showed 256MB scoring a 3D Mark2001 12333, and the 512MB scoring 12478. In other words, the graph is scaled in a way that makes 140 points in the 12000 range look devastating. So, at least according to 3D Mark 2001 scores, 256MB is the better value. Am I missing something?
Here's the system I'm building:
2500+
Via KM400 mobo
GF4 Ti 4x00 or 9600 Pro
Fortissimo II
XP Home
I do a lot of Web surfing, some gaming at fairly standard settings, listen to music, and watch DVDs. Is it worth it for me to buy 512MB PC2700?