Originally posted by: Electric Amish
Especially if you take into account the ZONE...
I'd theorize a BUTTLOAD +1.
Originally posted by: Kyteland
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
Especially if you take into account the ZONE...
I'd theorize a BUTTLOAD +1.
Whoa there! Don't try any of this technical mumbo jumbo with me!!
Originally posted by: madcowdisease
buttload ^ buttload
Originally posted by: Rossman
Buttload^2
It is entirely different unless a Buttload happens to be 2Originally posted by: Bignate603
Originally posted by: madcowdisease
buttload ^ buttload
How is that different from...
Originally posted by: Rossman
Buttload^2
so thus...
REPOST!
![]()
Originally posted by: Bignate603
Originally posted by: madcowdisease
buttload ^ buttload
How is that different from...
Originally posted by: Rossman
Buttload^2
so thus...
REPOST!
![]()
Originally posted by: Bignate603
Originally posted by: madcowdisease
buttload ^ buttload
How is that different from...
so thus...Originally posted by: Rossman
Buttload^2
REPOST!
![]()
Originally posted by: Spikesoldier
neyone noootice that Bandwidth is spellt rrong?
![]()
Originally posted by: compudog
Symantec has a buttload of bandwidth too. Do a Live Update and watch how fast it streams in the virus defs. Amazing, maybe there are local caches that load up on frequently requested stuff like MS's regular service packs and Symantec's Virus defs??
buttload^buttload+2
Originally posted by: compudog
Right, the defs aren't big, but they come in so FAST. I just loaded Norton 2001 on an older system and couldn't get over how fast the Live Update went (almost 8MB total) for the first LU and less each subsequent time.
Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
Originally posted by: compudog
Right, the defs aren't big, but they come in so FAST. I just loaded Norton 2001 on an older system and couldn't get over how fast the Live Update went (almost 8MB total) for the first LU and less each subsequent time.
hehe, yeah grisoft sucks. my avg update just downloaded at a top speed of 175![]()