- Nov 1, 2001
- 61,504
- 12
- 56
i am FAR from clueless.Originally posted by: alkemyst
I think you are clueless.
People fall into categories easily...you search long and hard enough you are bound to find true love several times.
It all depends on you views of polygamy on how many you keep around at once.
I have learned looooong ago, no matter what I think I lost, true love is just around the corner.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
i am FAR from clueless.Originally posted by: alkemyst
I think you are clueless.
People fall into categories easily...you search long and hard enough you are bound to find true love several times.
It all depends on you views of polygamy on how many you keep around at once.
I have learned looooong ago, no matter what I think I lost, true love is just around the corner.
i guess the topic of what "true love" actually is is open for debate. but i think it is defined as unconditional.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: moshquerade
i am FAR from clueless.Originally posted by: alkemyst
I think you are clueless.
People fall into categories easily...you search long and hard enough you are bound to find true love several times.
It all depends on you views of polygamy on how many you keep around at once.
I have learned looooong ago, no matter what I think I lost, true love is just around the corner.
i guess the topic of what "true love" actually is is open for debate. but i think it is defined as unconditional.
No, he's right, you are definitely clueless.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
how many times do you think you can experience true love?
Originally posted by: dtyn
Before you can classify love, you must know that love is illogical, and thus unclassifiable. To try and assign catagories to love means that you must have a definition of love, and as love's definition changes from person to person, it is impossible to have an accurate classification of love.
Edit: spelling
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: dtyn
Before you can classify love, you must know that love is illogical, and thus unclassifiable. To try and assign catagories to love means that you must have a definition of love, and as love's definition changes from person to person, it is impossible to have an accurate classification of love.
Edit: spelling
not true. every man knows when he is in love. mr winky tells him.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
fush shoo all
yeh, i am a girl, and i could whoop most of you. i would truly love it.![]()
if there weren't any conditions.......then yesOriginally posted by: Evadman
Originally posted by: moshquerade
fush shoo all
yeh, i am a girl, and i could whoop most of you. i would truly love it.![]()
But would it be "Unconditonal Love?"
Originally posted by: moshquerade
i am FAR from clueless.
i guess the topic of what "true love" actually is is open for debate. but i think it is defined as unconditional.
Unconditional...?
Only for my daughter. And my mother, since I had my daughter. As for every other person on the planet... well, not unconditional. hurt me badly enough and I will close my heart and life to that person. End of story.
As for how many times you can be "in love" ... I am not sure. To me it seems that being "in love" is something that lasts for the first 6-8 months of a relationship then either fades altogether or grows into something much deeper. I do believe, however that a person can be "in love" more than just once in a lifetime and with more than one person in a lifetime.
![]()
