Originally posted by: JTsyo
How long before you can get a 42" laser TV for under 2K? I remember afters CES '08 they were at like 7K, I forget the size though. It seems to be the next step in TVs but I think I'll have to get a LCD as a stop gap.
So, let me get this straight: a 65" laser display with insane display quality is "a pipe dream", but an 11" OLED that loses half its brightness in 6 months is "the next step". I think you are massively underestimating the quality and progress of Mitsubishi's LaserVue set and the technology behind it.Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: JTsyo
How long before you can get a 42" laser TV for under 2K? I remember afters CES '08 they were at like 7K, I forget the size though. It seems to be the next step in TVs but I think I'll have to get a LCD as a stop gap.
It's not the next step, OLED is the next step. For now, LaserTV is just Mitsubishi's pipe dream, and it ain't that great of a dream. There's really nothing fantastic about LaserTV. The only thing cool about it is, it has "Laser" in the name. Like I said, OLED will be the next step but that's still a ways off. So buy what you want now and don't worry about the future.
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: JTsyo
How long before you can get a 42" laser TV for under 2K? I remember afters CES '08 they were at like 7K, I forget the size though. It seems to be the next step in TVs but I think I'll have to get a LCD as a stop gap.
It's not the next step, OLED is the next step. For now, LaserTV is just Mitsubishi's pipe dream, and it ain't that great of a dream. There's really nothing fantastic about LaserTV. The only thing cool about it is, it has "Laser" in the name. Like I said, OLED will be the next step but that's still a ways off. So buy what you want now and don't worry about the future.
To dive into the nittier gritter, it has the widest color gamut of any set Gary's ever tested, far beyond the HDTV Rec. 709 broadcast standard: "Reds are so intense and crimson they?re indescribable. Ditto for yellows, purples and other colors and hues."
And brightness against the brightest LCDs is like the sun against the moon: 110.88-foot lamberts, compared to 70 for the most eyeball-pounding LCDs, when they aren't calibrated to show deep blacks?then they usually drop to about 30. Yet the LaserVue produces "jet black" blacks. Yet the power consumption is positively green: A mere 94 watts on average drive its intense 65-inch screen. LCDs and plasmas use 3x-4x that, and often more.
Originally posted by: erwos
So, let me get this straight: a 65" laser display with insane display quality is "a pipe dream", but an 11" OLED that loses half its brightness in 6 months is "the next step". I think you are massively underestimating the quality and progress of Mitsubishi's LaserVue set and the technology behind it.Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: JTsyo
How long before you can get a 42" laser TV for under 2K? I remember afters CES '08 they were at like 7K, I forget the size though. It seems to be the next step in TVs but I think I'll have to get a LCD as a stop gap.
It's not the next step, OLED is the next step. For now, LaserTV is just Mitsubishi's pipe dream, and it ain't that great of a dream. There's really nothing fantastic about LaserTV. The only thing cool about it is, it has "Laser" in the name. Like I said, OLED will be the next step but that's still a ways off. So buy what you want now and don't worry about the future.
Unfortunately, the market seems completely unwilling to buy anything that's more than 2" deep, so that might doom the LaserVue anyways. No accounting for taste, I suppose.
Originally posted by: JTsyo
Looking at an old review. They had only good things to talk about the picture quality.
The owners thread is here:Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: JTsyo
Looking at an old review. They had only good things to talk about the picture quality.
If you want to read up on it with people that actually own it or have seen it in person, have at it.
Originally posted by: erwos
The owners thread is here:Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: JTsyo
Looking at an old review. They had only good things to talk about the picture quality.
If you want to read up on it with people that actually own it or have seen it in person, have at it.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1108686
Most of the people who "saw" the TV on the thread you linked were just looking at it in Fry's - not exactly what I'd call very useful viewing. I'd trust professional reviews over that any day of the week, good impression or bad.