Pliablemoose
Lifer
- Oct 11, 1999
- 25,195
- 0
- 56
LOL, 1, for thread crapping in a thread where I was trying to expalin how big a success the iPad was going to be.
Mods 1
Pliablemoose $293,000

Mods 1
Pliablemoose $293,000
How are you guys checking to see how many infractions you have? Always been curious how this is done.
Thanks in advance.
As long as you realize it's all your fault, we're good.
Albert Einstein said:Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
If I make a mistake, I'll gladly own it.
We're human, we all screw up. The point is to learn from them and not repeat the same mistakes.
If I make a mistake, I'll gladly own it.
We're human, we all screw up. The point is to learn from them and not repeat the same mistakes.
Thank you very much lxskllr! You may deduct up to 5 infractions from your list for being helpful. :awe:
I hope you're not a stick in the mud in real life.
No, no they don't.
Yeh, like the GIANT sticky we left up for months and months and months wasn't enough fair warning? We Pm'ed people until we were blue in the face and people still didn't update their info. It's not our fault nobody bothers to read or comprehend the rules or stickies.
They sure as hell do find the ont thing we ever do wrong and pick that apart though.![]()
Well I never got a PM. Harumph.![]()
I realize that, but it seems a PM would be less work overall than locking a thread, editing the thread, and issuing an infraction. Perhaps not if you consider having to follow up after, I dunno. I tried to look up the date of the original sticky, but it's gone now and the new thread is dated several months later.Like I said, We really thought a sticky that was up for many many months would have covered it. Since we left it up for an extended period without infracting people, at some point you have to move forward and start holding people accountable.
I thought I put that on the forum changeover, not the mods.And for the record, WE didn't wipe out any profile settings in FS/FT. It's a manually entered field that YOU needed to populate. Basically, FT allowed us to make that field visible, VB doesn't.
I realize that, but it seems a PM would be less work overall than locking a thread, editing the thread, and issuing an infraction. Perhaps not if you consider having to follow up after, I dunno. I tried to look up the date of the original sticky, but it's gone now and the new thread is dated several months later.
Are there different levels of infractions that trigger discipline for different posters?
Seems like alkemyst and Hal9000 can do whatever they want with impunity? Srsly, what's up with that guys?
Are there different levels of infractions that trigger discipline for different posters?
Seems like alkemyst and Hal9000 can do whatever they want with impunity? Srsly, what's up with that guys?
alkemyst is a zajillionaire
and neckbeard has diplomatic immunity
what i want to know is: how did this unofficial rule come about that that bowel movements are unmentionable and thus lockable, but any and every other bodily function may be discussed with impunity
It bothers you that you can't post about your bowel movements?
not just mine but the bowel movements of others as well
