Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Neverending Story
Neverending Story 2
Nemo, Finding
All i can think of off the top of my head, I'd have to look when I get home
Nemo, Finding
um, wtf? That doesn't even come close to counting...
The Defense would like to present to the Court Cheaparses allegations that Nemo does not start with an N.
However, upon viewing the spelling of said word, Nemo, one can clearly see the word does in fact begin with an N.
We ask the Court to dismiss CheapArses allegations, as they have been proven false.
Therefore, I will have to say that Nemo, Finding does indeed count as a movie beginning with N.
Originally posted by: puffff
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Neverending Story
Neverending Story 2
Nemo, Finding
All i can think of off the top of my head, I'd have to look when I get home
Nemo, Finding
um, wtf? That doesn't even come close to counting...
The Defense would like to present to the Court Cheaparses allegations that Nemo does not start with an N.
However, upon viewing the spelling of said word, Nemo, one can clearly see the word does in fact begin with an N.
We ask the Court to dismiss CheapArses allegations, as they have been proven false.
Therefore, I will have to say that Nemo, Finding does indeed count as a movie beginning with N.
The Prosecution would like to point out to the court that CheapArse did not infer that Nemo does not start with an N, but rather rearranging the title of Finding Nemo in the form of Nemo, Finding is a gross crime against the English grammar structure.
edit: CheapArse also realizes that this^ sentence might very well be a gross crime against the English grammar structure in of itself, but he doesn't really care.![]()
The Defense would like to interject at this time that during catalogueing of movies it is appropriate to drop the first word of a movie and move that word to the end. An example of this would be The Mummy, which for purposes of catalogueing the word The would be moved to the end thus the movie would be catalogued as Mummy, The. The Defense felt that such catalogueing technicques would be appropriate for the movie Finding Nemo. Thus, said movie was catalogued as Nemo, Finding.
Objection!
The Prosecution would like to commend The Defense for its very small grasp of the catalogueing techniques, but would like to point out to the court that dropping the first word of the title is only plausible when said word is either The, A, And, or Or.
![]()
The Defense would like to recess for the day and reconvene tomorrow. At this time The Defense will need extra time to review its case.
hahahahahah.
well played!
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Neverending Story
Neverending Story 2
Nemo, Finding
All i can think of off the top of my head, I'd have to look when I get home
Nemo, Finding
um, wtf? That doesn't even come close to counting...
The Defense would like to present to the Court Cheaparses allegations that Nemo does not start with an N.
However, upon viewing the spelling of said word, Nemo, one can clearly see the word does in fact begin with an N.
We ask the Court to dismiss CheapArses allegations, as they have been proven false.
Therefore, I will have to say that Nemo, Finding does indeed count as a movie beginning with N.
The Prosecution would like to point out to the court that CheapArse did not infer that Nemo does not start with an N, but rather rearranging the title of Finding Nemo in the form of Nemo, Finding is a gross crime against the English grammar structure.
edit: CheapArse also realizes that this^ sentence might very well be a gross crime against the English grammar structure in of itself, but he doesn't really care.![]()
The Defense would like to interject at this time that during catalogueing of movies it is appropriate to drop the first word of a movie and move that word to the end. An example of this would be The Mummy, which for purposes of catalogueing the word The would be moved to the end thus the movie would be catalogued as Mummy, The. The Defense felt that such catalogueing technicques would be appropriate for the movie Finding Nemo. Thus, said movie was catalogued as Nemo, Finding.
Objection!
The Prosecution would like to commend The Defense for its very small grasp of the catalogueing techniques, but would like to point out to the court that dropping the first word of the title is only plausible when said word is either The, A, And, or Or.
![]()
The Defense would like to recess for the day and reconvene tomorrow. At this time The Defense will need extra time to review its case.
