- May 1, 2001
- 3,004
- 3
- 81
Hi All. For my new X58/i7-920 build I have been trying to figure out how many drives I will need. I have thought about buying a SSD, and don't think I will. What is driving me getting a new rig is Photoshop CS4 and Bridge. I will be installing Windows 7 64-bit w/ 6GB Ram. A few scamarios:
I will buy a 1TB WD Caviar Black drive for C for OS) and D for (Data) drive. BUT I need to have the Photoshop scratch disk on the fastest drive, which would be C. And I will have lots of slowdown issues if I also leave the Win 7 page file on this single physical hard drive. So I need to move the page file somewhere else. A few thoughts:
1. If I use the WD Caviar Black drive for the O/S and data storage, I will need another physical drive for the Win 7 page file. How about putting it on a 4 year old PATA Seagate drive?
2. If no to #1 then how many new drives should I buy? Should I buy a new HD just to put the page file on (along with other archived data).
3. I was thinking of going with RAID Mirroring, but I hear doing so on the X58 based mobo isn't really going to gain any performance. BUT I want to do this for a bit of data redundancy (though certainly not bullet proof).
What do you guys think?
I will buy a 1TB WD Caviar Black drive for C for OS) and D for (Data) drive. BUT I need to have the Photoshop scratch disk on the fastest drive, which would be C. And I will have lots of slowdown issues if I also leave the Win 7 page file on this single physical hard drive. So I need to move the page file somewhere else. A few thoughts:
1. If I use the WD Caviar Black drive for the O/S and data storage, I will need another physical drive for the Win 7 page file. How about putting it on a 4 year old PATA Seagate drive?
2. If no to #1 then how many new drives should I buy? Should I buy a new HD just to put the page file on (along with other archived data).
3. I was thinking of going with RAID Mirroring, but I hear doing so on the X58 based mobo isn't really going to gain any performance. BUT I want to do this for a bit of data redundancy (though certainly not bullet proof).
What do you guys think?