Originally posted by: oldman420
thanks i will be using an nf7-s board so i can get as low a 1.0 all the way to 2.0 vcore.
it seems like i may be able to get this cpu to run at 10-20 watts at 500 mhz
any guesses
Once you know the power consumption and voltage of a CPU, its quiet easy to calculate its power consumption at lower settings. It won?t be 100% accurate but should be within 95% most times.
Power is a function of the square of voltage.
What that means is that if you double the voltage, the power goes up by 2* 2 = 4 times.
This means that getting the lowest voltage possible is essential for low power output.
1V sounds pretty good for an Athlon XP. The Athlon 64s can handle 0.8V easily but I?m not sure if the XPs can handle that or more importantly if any boards support that? Unless you are using clockgen to lower the settings?
Power and Frequency relate in more or less a linear way. Double the frequency at the same voltage and the power doubles.
You can use this formula to make calculations:
Power = Volts * Volts * Frequency
I don?t mean that this formula has a real meaning, but just that it symbolises the relationship between these 3 factors.
For an imaginary XP chip say it had the following values:
Power = 70W
Freq = 2000 MHz
Voltage = 1.7V
If you change the Freq to 1,000 and the voltage to 1.3V the formula for the new power rating is as follows.
Note:
P1 = original power rating
V2 = new voltage rating etc
P2 = P1 * F2 / F1 * (V1 * V1) / (V2 * V2)
P2 = 70 * 2000 / 1000 * (1.3 * 1.3) / (1.7 * 1.7) = 20.5
If you can get to 1V you should be under 10W.
I used to passively cool a Celeron 600 in a system that only had a power supply fan. That was rated at 1.5 but my motherboard went down to 1.3V which I calculated equated to 9V from the stock 12.5.
Try the forums at
www.silentpcreview.com
They have some hardcore under-clockers there.
One guy is running an A64 @ 1 GHz @ 0.9V which equates to only 15W.