Spring generally don't need to be replaced until something like 30 years, and even then it's completely optional. I have a coworker with a '53 Chevy pickup, original springs.
Struts and bushings were ready for replacement in my 91 Accord at around the 220,000 mile (that's miles, not km) mark. The bushing were groaning a bit in the cold earlier than that. The car still drove fine but was starting to cup the tires at that point.
It's hard for me to believe any modern car not having the suspension last 150,000 miles or more unless you really beat it on bad roads or something.
Having the suspension last, and having GOOD suspension are two different things. Sure the suspension can last for a long time, but at about 100,000 miles you probably want new suspension to get the handling back to what it was when the car was newer.
That said, if you just need a beater car for communting, you just want the suspension to hold up, and not have to be the best performer.
In my experience, three things affect suspension longevity :
(1)- Tightness of the suspension. Firmer, more 'sporty' suspensions wear out quicker.
(2)- Driving habits.
(3)- Weight of the vehicle. A two-ton land yacht will probably eat suspension components quicker than a 2500lb economy car.
This is just my experience and opinions distilled into what I generally believe to be true. I could be wrong, and there may be exceptions.
my springs are 30 years old and they don't need to be replaced because none are broken. I only have rear springs anyway but they need to be re-arched.
Shocks are fine all around.
You have springs in the front too. They might be coil springs or torsion bars, but you have springs in the front.
My Saturn L100 has original struts all around (130,000 miles) and it handles just like new.