How long before nukes go off?

[hagbard]

Given the way things are heading, I'd bet within a year, probably six months.

 

[RU482]

who cares

 

[AntaresVI]

hagbard is a idiot

 

[Wallydraigle]

Whenever terrorists gain possession of one.

 

[Yzzim]

Originally posted by: lirion
Whenever terrorists gain possession of one.

France already has them

 

[datalink7]

Originally posted by: hagbard
Given the way things are heading, I'd bet within a year, probably six months.

How much you wanna bet? I'll take your bet.

 

[illusion88]

Originally posted by: LeRocks
hagbard is a idiot

agreed

 

[Evadman]

Originally posted by: Yzzim

Originally posted by: lirion
Whenever terrorists gain possession of one.

France already has them

ow.

 

[Nohr]

How long before nukes go off?

As soon as I can figure out these bloody instructions!!

 

[hagbard]

Originally posted by: Yzzim

Originally posted by: lirion
Whenever terrorists gain possession of one.

France already has them

You might enjoy this:

Nuke France

or not.

 

[XZeroII]

Originally posted by: Nohr

How long before nukes go off?

As soon as I can figure out these bloody instructions!!

hear hear. For $40 million dollars you'd think they would make english instructions.

 

[ElFenix]

they already did go off. most recently france set some off in the south pacific

 

[Czar]

Originally posted by: Nohr

How long before nukes go off?

As soon as I can figure out these bloody instructions!!

teaches you not to buy those from people on ebay

 

[hagbard]

Originally posted by: ElFenix
they already did go off. most recently france set some off in the south pacific

I mean in war. How would you have worded it?

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: LeRocks
hagbard is a idiot

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: ElFenix
they already did go off. most recently france set some off in the south pacific

I mean in war. How would you have worded it?

two have been set off in war

 

[illusion88]

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: ElFenix
they already did go off. most recently france set some off in the south pacific

I mean in war. How would you have worded it?

Dude... There aren't going to be any nukes flying. No country would do that. And another thing... what makes you so sure that it will be in the near future?

 

[hagbard]

Originally posted by: illusion88

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: ElFenix
they already did go off. most recently france set some off in the south pacific

I mean in war. How would you have worded it?

Dude... There aren't going to be any nukes flying. No country would do that. And another thing... what makes you so sure that it will be in the near future?

Why do you want an idiot's opinion?

1. The US has said it won't rule out using a nuke in Iraq
2. North Korea has threatened to pre-emptively strick if it feels threatened by the US

 

[beer]

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: illusion88

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: ElFenix
they already did go off. most recently france set some off in the south pacific

I mean in war. How would you have worded it?

Dude... There aren't going to be any nukes flying. No country would do that. And another thing... what makes you so sure that it will be in the near future?

Why do you want an idiot's opinion?

1. The US has said it won't rule out using a nuke in Iraq
2. North Korea has threatened to pre-emptively strick if it feels threatened by the US

Neither side is actually dumb enough to use them. In fact, you're at an intelligence level of a small rodent if oyu actually think the US would use them.

 

[Rudee]

Originally posted by: LeRocks
hagbard is a idiot

 

[wnied]

Given the way things are heading, I'd bet within a year, probably six months.

Why do you care? If one goes off, I dont think there will be enough of you left to worry about it either way.

~wnied~

 

[hagbard]

Originally posted by: Elemental007

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: illusion88

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: ElFenix
they already did go off. most recently france set some off in the south pacific

I mean in war. How would you have worded it?

Dude... There aren't going to be any nukes flying. No country would do that. And another thing... what makes you so sure that it will be in the near future?

Why do you want an idiot's opinion?

1. The US has said it won't rule out using a nuke in Iraq
2. North Korea has threatened to pre-emptively strick if it feels threatened by the US

Neither side is actually dumb enough to use them. In fact, you're at an intelligence level of a small rodent if oyu actually think the US would use them.

Bush has already said he would.

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: illusion88

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: ElFenix
they already did go off. most recently france set some off in the south pacific

I mean in war. How would you have worded it?

Dude... There aren't going to be any nukes flying. No country would do that. And another thing... what makes you so sure that it will be in the near future?

Why do you want an idiot's opinion?

1. The US has said it won't rule out using a nuke in Iraq
2. North Korea has threatened to pre-emptively strick if it feels threatened by the US

yeah rule out using a nuke so that saddam can use his WMD without fear of retaliation in kind

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: ElFenix
they already did go off. most recently france set some off in the south pacific

I mean in war. How would you have worded it?

That too has already happened.

 

[Tripleshot]

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: Elemental007

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: illusion88

Originally posted by: hagbard

Originally posted by: ElFenix
they already did go off. most recently france set some off in the south pacific

I mean in war. How would you have worded it?

Dude... There aren't going to be any nukes flying. No country would do that. And another thing... what makes you so sure that it will be in the near future?

Why do you want an idiot's opinion?

1. The US has said it won't rule out using a nuke in Iraq
2. North Korea has threatened to pre-emptively strick if it feels threatened by the US

Neither side is actually dumb enough to use them. In fact, you're at an intelligence level of a small rodent if oyu actually think the US would use them.

Bush has already said he would.

I feel so sorry for you. You seem to be so fearful and distrustful, and your world must be so poor to live in, I realy pity you. If you must spend anytime at all on this BB to justify your belief that America and Israel are the root of all evil, and Islam is the only path to nervana, you waste so much energy. No one believes you, no one supports you. You have the right to speak, that will not be denied, but why? You are lambasted for your anti American posts continously. I for one sometimes have a hard time believing you believe anything you say, let alone trying to convince anyone else.

If you are playing devils advocate for Muslims, fine, you are entertaining. If you believe half of what you say, you are in serious need of help.

Case in point---Bush never said he would use nukes. He said he will not take off the table as an option. If the US or Israel were attacked by WMD or Nuke, the option can be exercised. In fact, if that scenerio ever did play out, Hag, it doesn't matter. All world order will be null and void, and the democracies of the World would make sure nothing of this type of threat will ever happen again, even if it meant destruction of ALL enemies of peace and freedom, which is much of what radical Muslims are calling for now.

Do you think for a moment Osama, Jing, Saddam, or anyone else is going to launch a strike of such earth shaking magnitude as that? If you do, you have a vivid imigination, and a warped sense of propriety.

I sure hope you find peace.