Originally posted by: Quixfire
Get a Escort GT they are better.
Originally posted by: ndee
I am thinking about getting a 2002 Ferrari Enzo pretty soon. I was wondering about the reliability of an Enzo or should I just go for an extra 220K and get the McLaren F1?
Originally posted by: Cruisin1
uh... are you seirous? If not stop wasting space.
Actually it overheats in trafficOriginally posted by: Aharami
get an mclaren man! waaaaaay more reliable than an enzo. also u can carry 2 of your b!tches in the F1 as opposed to only one in the enzo. can we say 3sum!
Originally posted by: LAUST
Actually it overheats in trafficOriginally posted by: Aharami
get an mclaren man! waaaaaay more reliable than an enzo. also u can carry 2 of your b!tches in the F1 as opposed to only one in the enzo. can we say 3sum!![]()
Originally posted by: Aharami
get an mclaren man! waaaaaay more reliable than an enzo. also u can carry 2 of your b!tches in the F1 as opposed to only one in the enzo. can we say 3sum!
Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
Seriously, from what I have read, Ferraris aren't exactly reliable. They last so long, and are in such good condition because the owners take care of them so well. I bet if I took really good care of my Civic, it would last me a very long time too. Read up on the 2003 Modena long term review on Edmunds. Problems upon problems upon problems. Some of those problems are down right embarassing. Sure a person who can afford a ferrari doesn't really care about reliability. But you still don't want you car just shutting down anywhere it feels like. Once they were showing their car to some people, and it just quit running, and wont start. Imagine the embarrasment.