- May 24, 2005
- 6,369
- 437
- 126
I noticed in the Kraken G10 review that water cooling can reduce power consumption (presumably its more efficient than a blower fan) and reduced the stock 290X power consumption by 44W.
Does this mean that in theory the card would have 44W more overclocking headroom? (i.e., sensors limit TDP based on PCI-E power draw measurements). Or does this have nothing to do with how much TDP headroom a card can use for overclocking? (i.e., drivers only sense how much power the GPU core itself is pulling, i.e the fan can draw 60W for all it cares and it doesn't affect TDP throttling).
Does this mean that in theory the card would have 44W more overclocking headroom? (i.e., sensors limit TDP based on PCI-E power draw measurements). Or does this have nothing to do with how much TDP headroom a card can use for overclocking? (i.e., drivers only sense how much power the GPU core itself is pulling, i.e the fan can draw 60W for all it cares and it doesn't affect TDP throttling).