- Sep 18, 2000
- 14,038
- 1
- 81
I've read that it's better and I'm sure it's betetr but I've been out of the loop for awhile now.
The PCI bus is running on a parallel interface now, is it not?? I can see that if multiple PCI cards were to be accessed, it will cause the bus to starve. What about PCI E?? Does it have an independent channel for each slot? Someone told me that the PCI E is based on serial interface, wouldn't this be a problem too when the first slot to gain priority of the bandwidth would starve the rest of the remainder ones??
Please clue me on this. I think I know how it operates but there are a few things bugging me. Unless the PCI E has a single channel to itself, it won't be much better than the PCI.
The PCI bus is running on a parallel interface now, is it not?? I can see that if multiple PCI cards were to be accessed, it will cause the bus to starve. What about PCI E?? Does it have an independent channel for each slot? Someone told me that the PCI E is based on serial interface, wouldn't this be a problem too when the first slot to gain priority of the bandwidth would starve the rest of the remainder ones??
Please clue me on this. I think I know how it operates but there are a few things bugging me. Unless the PCI E has a single channel to itself, it won't be much better than the PCI.