How is cingular's coverage these days compared to verizon?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jadinolf

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
20,952
3
81
Originally posted by: Phokus
Hey guys, i've had verizon for years and i remember cingular/att wireless didn't have very good coverage in my area a few years ago... since attwireless and cingular consolidated, has their coverage improved a lot? I'm thinking of switching to them.

I cannot compare but they put up a new antenna in my area and now, instead of getting no bars, I get all bars.
 

sash1

Diamond Member
Jul 20, 2001
8,896
1
0
Now that I live down south, Cingular's coverage is complete crap. I'm planning on switching as soon as my contract is up.
 

j00fek

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2005
8,099
1
0
no one compares to vze's covereage in the northeast still, even tho they are way behind on technology i feel. everytime i call my friend on tmobile it takes at least 5-10sec to connect to his network. basicaly the same with cingular friends 3-10sec to connect.
 

sinucus

Senior member
Feb 3, 2004
266
0
0
Originally posted by: supafly
Depends on the location. Cingular & T-mobile suck ass in Virginia. In Connecticut, they seem to have pretty good coverage.


Quoted for truth. Cingular bites it in Central VA. Sprint's coverage in these parts is the best.

I'm a 5 year cingular customer coming from New Orleans. Their coverage there was top notch but I couldn't find a cell tower here with GPS, a map and the cell site engineer from a couple replys back. Stupid cingular won't let me out of my contract either. :(
 

AMDMaddness

Platinum Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,406
2
81
Originally posted by: j00fek
no one compares to vze's covereage in the northeast still, even tho they are way behind on technology i feel. everytime i call my friend on tmobile it takes at least 5-10sec to connect to his network. basicaly the same with cingular friends 3-10sec to connect.

The connection time between carriers isn?t due to them its due to latency between switches and the PSTN. So don?t say it's the carrier?s issue they have to still go through the public switching telephone network that is your delay that and the Verizon switches response time to send the page out.

Originally posted by: sinucus
Originally posted by: supafly
Depends on the location. Cingular & T-mobile suck ass in Virginia. In Connecticut, they seem to have pretty good coverage.


Quoted for truth. Cingular bites it in Central VA. Sprint's coverage in these parts is the best.

I'm a 5 year cingular customer coming from New Orleans. Their coverage there was top notch but I couldn't find a cell tower here with GPS, a map and the cell site engineer from a couple replys back. Stupid cingular won't let me out of my contract either. :(

As we have said Cingular doesn?t own any cell sites or air rights in VA it?s up to the local carrier to provide you the service and it looks like they do a poor job of it (t-mobile as I look at the coverage map who you will roam off of). A lot of you claim Verizon has better coverage are mistaken. Cingular has more cell sites in more places than any one bar none, overall Cingular has more coverage some areas maybe not but as a whole they are the top. We aren?t the lowest dropped call carrier for nothing. If you have been with Cingular for 5 yrs why do you still have a contract? If your in VA you are most likely not profitable to Cingular call them again and see what they can do for you....can you even get a local number? or you still based out of N.O.?


 

mb

Lifer
Jun 27, 2004
10,233
2
71
Originally posted by: sinucus
Originally posted by: supafly
Depends on the location. Cingular & T-mobile suck ass in Virginia. In Connecticut, they seem to have pretty good coverage.


Quoted for truth. Cingular bites it in Central VA. Sprint's coverage in these parts is the best.

I'm a 5 year cingular customer coming from New Orleans. Their coverage there was top notch but I couldn't find a cell tower here with GPS, a map and the cell site engineer from a couple replys back. Stupid cingular won't let me out of my contract either. :(

As we have said Cingular doesn?t own any cell sites or air rights in VA it?s up to the local carrier to provide you the service and it looks like they do a poor job of it (t-mobile as I look at the coverage map who you will roam off of). A lot of you claim Verizon has better coverage are mistaken. Cingular has more cell sites in more places than any one bar none, overall Cingular has more coverage some areas maybe not but as a whole they are the top. We aren?t the lowest dropped call carrier for nothing. [/quote]


What kind of BS excuse is that? It still does not change the fact that the GSM network as a whole SUCKS in Virginia. I don't care who owns the rights, it SUCKS. Do I need to make it any clearer for you?

And no, we're not mistaken that Verizon has better coverage - they do. Cingular may (or may not, I don't know) have more cell towers, but guess what - they need to in order to have somewhat decent coverage. Verizon doesn't need as many towers placed so closely together to cover a certain area.

I still don't believe this lowest dropped call crap either. My mom, sister, and her bf have Cingular. They drop calls like none other. I've yet to drop a call in 2 years with Verizon.. my dad has had verizon for ~8 years and in that entire time he can't recall it happening much at all. Where did these "independent researchers" do their testing anyway? Who are they? Did they test it right under a GSM tower, while testing other networks on an analog connection? That seems to be the only way possible for Cingular to have less dropped calls.

FFS, GSM isn't all that great people. My family has been to Europe plenty of times. My gf is in Italy right now. They all rent GSM phones over there, and even there where the GSM network has been built up so much more, they still drop lots of calls, especially indoors no matter how close to a tower or how many "bars" they have.
 

lokiju

Lifer
May 29, 2003
18,526
5
0
I had to get rid of my Cingular because of coverage issues, Verizon has been solid and I haven't had the dropping out issues that Cingular had all with time for my fiancee, brother, sister in-law and myself.

 

AMDMaddness

Platinum Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,406
2
81
Originally posted by: supafly
Originally posted by: sinucus
Originally posted by: supafly
Depends on the location. Cingular & T-mobile suck ass in Virginia. In Connecticut, they seem to have pretty good coverage.


Quoted for truth. Cingular bites it in Central VA. Sprint's coverage in these parts is the best.

I'm a 5 year cingular customer coming from New Orleans. Their coverage there was top notch but I couldn't find a cell tower here with GPS, a map and the cell site engineer from a couple replys back. Stupid cingular won't let me out of my contract either. :(

As we have said Cingular doesn?t own any cell sites or air rights in VA it?s up to the local carrier to provide you the service and it looks like they do a poor job of it (t-mobile as I look at the coverage map who you will roam off of). A lot of you claim Verizon has better coverage are mistaken. Cingular has more cell sites in more places than any one bar none, overall Cingular has more coverage some areas maybe not but as a whole they are the top. We aren?t the lowest dropped call carrier for nothing.


What kind of BS excuse is that? It still does not change the fact that the GSM network as a whole SUCKS in Virginia. I don't care who owns the rights, it SUCKS. Do I need to make it any clearer for you?

And no, we're not mistaken that Verizon has better coverage - they do. Cingular may (or may not, I don't know) have more cell towers, but guess what - they need to in order to have somewhat decent coverage. Verizon doesn't need as many towers placed so closely together to cover a certain area.

I still don't believe this lowest dropped call crap either. My mom, sister, and her bf have Cingular. They drop calls like none other. I've yet to drop a call in 2 years with Verizon.. my dad has had verizon for ~8 years and in that entire time he can't recall it happening much at all. Where did these "independent researchers" do their testing anyway? Who are they? Did they test it right under a GSM tower, while testing other networks on an analog connection? That seems to be the only way possible for Cingular to have less dropped calls.

FFS, GSM isn't all that great people. My family has been to Europe plenty of times. My gf is in Italy right now. They all rent GSM phones over there, and even there where the GSM network has been built up so much more, they still drop lots of calls, especially indoors no matter how close to a tower or how many "bars" they have.[/quote]

Its not am excuse it?s the facts.... They don?t own the service to make it better they don?t provide the service its not there problem that they can fix its up to T-mobile... its like saying you get your home phone from joe blows telco and its broken, but verizon actualy provides the wire line joe blow isn?t going to fix it they cant verizon owns the lines they only resale or provide the best they can from some one else. I have worked for Cingular all over the US I lived in south MS and worked in New Orleans the Florida panhandle. Alabama. GA and SC/NC where I am now I have used other providers phones I can see some strong areas from some and strong areas from us but as a whole they are matched in metro areas but in rural we have them beat.

GSM is nothing more than TDMA except you get 8 calls per channel VS the old TDMA of 3. When UMTS (w-cdma) is fully built out there will be no match it beats regular CDMA pretty good. GSM isn?t all that it can have static but unlike CDMA which works or doesn?t GSM at least lets you hold onto that call even when its less than perfect rather than drop you. You guys sure should do some research on how cell sites work its pretty interesting.

We all have our favorites and I can take it you have something against Cingular so be it. There is a company called Telephia that does all the call testing comparisons for all of the cellular companies. They do all the verification with some very neat and expensive equipment and no they don?t just drive around saying can you hear me now? They actually have GPS tracking involved and they can see all of the weak spots etc and where they dropped the call to the meter. They drive complete markets and trace all calls etc and compare them and they do all of the major carriers at the same time.


http://www.telephia.com/

 

mb

Lifer
Jun 27, 2004
10,233
2
71
Originally posted by: AMDMaddness
Originally posted by: supafly
Originally posted by: sinucus
Originally posted by: supafly
Depends on the location. Cingular & T-mobile suck ass in Virginia. In Connecticut, they seem to have pretty good coverage.


Quoted for truth. Cingular bites it in Central VA. Sprint's coverage in these parts is the best.

I'm a 5 year cingular customer coming from New Orleans. Their coverage there was top notch but I couldn't find a cell tower here with GPS, a map and the cell site engineer from a couple replys back. Stupid cingular won't let me out of my contract either. :(

As we have said Cingular doesn?t own any cell sites or air rights in VA it?s up to the local carrier to provide you the service and it looks like they do a poor job of it (t-mobile as I look at the coverage map who you will roam off of). A lot of you claim Verizon has better coverage are mistaken. Cingular has more cell sites in more places than any one bar none, overall Cingular has more coverage some areas maybe not but as a whole they are the top. We aren?t the lowest dropped call carrier for nothing.


What kind of BS excuse is that? It still does not change the fact that the GSM network as a whole SUCKS in Virginia. I don't care who owns the rights, it SUCKS. Do I need to make it any clearer for you?

And no, we're not mistaken that Verizon has better coverage - they do. Cingular may (or may not, I don't know) have more cell towers, but guess what - they need to in order to have somewhat decent coverage. Verizon doesn't need as many towers placed so closely together to cover a certain area.

I still don't believe this lowest dropped call crap either. My mom, sister, and her bf have Cingular. They drop calls like none other. I've yet to drop a call in 2 years with Verizon.. my dad has had verizon for ~8 years and in that entire time he can't recall it happening much at all. Where did these "independent researchers" do their testing anyway? Who are they? Did they test it right under a GSM tower, while testing other networks on an analog connection? That seems to be the only way possible for Cingular to have less dropped calls.

FFS, GSM isn't all that great people. My family has been to Europe plenty of times. My gf is in Italy right now. They all rent GSM phones over there, and even there where the GSM network has been built up so much more, they still drop lots of calls, especially indoors no matter how close to a tower or how many "bars" they have.

Its not am excuse it?s the facts.... They don?t own the service to make it better they don?t provide the service its not there problem that they can fix its up to T-mobile... its like saying you get your home phone from joe blows telco and its broken, but verizon actualy provides the wire line joe blow isn?t going to fix it they cant verizon owns the lines they only resale or provide the best they can from some one else. I have worked for Cingular all over the US I lived in south MS and worked in New Orleans the Florida panhandle. Alabama. GA and SC/NC where I am now I have used other providers phones I can see some strong areas from some and strong areas from us but as a whole they are matched in metro areas but in rural we have them beat.

GSM is nothing more than TDMA except you get 8 calls per channel VS the old TDMA of 3. When UMTS (w-cdma) is fully built out there will be no match it beats regular CDMA pretty good. GSM isn?t all that it can have static but unlike CDMA which works or doesn?t GSM at least lets you hold onto that call even when its less than perfect rather than drop you.

We all have our favorites and I can take it you have something against Cingular so be it. There is a company called Telephia that does all the call testing comparisons for all of the cellular companies. They do all the verification with some very neat and expensive equipment and no they don?t just drive around saying can you hear me now? They actually have GPS tracking involved and they can see all of the weak spots etc and where they dropped the call to the meter. They drive complete markets and trace all calls etc and compare them.


[/quote]

You may not be directly saying it's an excuse, but whethe you realize it or not you are trying to excuse Cingular for the fact that GSM sucks hard in VA. Cingular used to be Suncom here before.. Suncom sucked, and the GSM service still does suck. I don't care if Cingular can or can't do anything about it, it still sucks. There is no getting around that simple fact. T-Mobile is exactly the same here, too.
How long do you think it would take to set up country-wide WCDMA here? Assuming they only work on just that and not what's coming after that, it would take them decades at the rate they've been expanding. But even that assumption can't hold up, because they will want to keep upgrading their networks capabilities, when they need to focus on coverage.

"unlike CDMA which works or doesn?t GSM at least lets you hold onto that call even when its less than perfect rather than drop you."
Thats a lie right there. I've heard it many times, but it simply isn't true. I live near the mountains. There are some "deadspots" where it seems hard to get a signal.. but when I drive through them talking on my (all digital) Verizon phone, I hold it. What happens with my familys Cingular phones? No service.

I have a thing against any company who makes such large, false claims as Cingular. At least T-Mobile doesn't try to hide their faults as bad.

During the first quarter of 2006, Telephia reported that during an extensive nationwide test of major wireless carriers, Cingular Wireless dropped the fewest number of calls across the country. Cingular in turn began advertising with more aggression the "Allover Network" citing Telephia as "the leading independent research company." This was in stark contrast to the Consumer Unions published "Consumer Reports" which slammed Cingular for static and dropped calls.

Telephia initially refused to provide details on its study, and a spokesman for the company has said, according to the Boston Globe, that "Cingular shouldn't have even mentioned the company's name to a reporter." [11] The research company later stated that Cingular had a "statistically significant lower dropped-call rate than the competition across some market/time period groupings," but that Telephia had "no knowledge of the specific methodology... Cingular used to reach the nationwide 'lowest dropped call' conclusion."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless
Wow, lovely work they did there.

* Recently, Telephia has published a report that Cingular Wireless drops the fewest calls across the country. Verizon Wireless advertises heavily the quality of their network above competitors.

Telephia independently measures the top four wireless carriers for a number of consumer value points. In relation to call quality, Telephia, in a letter to the four major carriers regarding this research, will not confirm or deny that Cingular drops the fewest calls. Also, Telephia has requested that Cingular update its advertising to indicate that Telephia provided the information it uses to make this claim, not that it actually supports or confirms the 'fewest dropped calls' claim. See Boston Globe Article Consumer Beat article by Bruce Mohl on May 14, 2006, page 2 Tepid Support [4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Wireless
 

AMDMaddness

Platinum Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,406
2
81
Telephia cant say to much or they will get involved in legal action.. its cut throat in wireless. No one will admit they are the worst in open public. It would kill there stock value. And you saying you can make a call in the mtns were with cingular you cant that easy.. they have better coverage in that area plain and simple. And yes what I said is true it either works or it doesnt. I have worked for more than just Cingular I have worked for CDMA carriers as well. When you spend as much time in wireless as I have and you up to snuff on how all of this works then come tell me how you feel.. your compairing apples to oranges in some respects.
 

mb

Lifer
Jun 27, 2004
10,233
2
71
Originally posted by: AMDMaddness
Telephia cant say to much or they will get involved in legal action.. its cut throat in wireless. No one will admit they are the worst in open public. It would kill there stock value. And you saying you can make a call in the mtns were with cingular you cant that easy.. they have better coverage in that area plain and simple. And yes what I said is true it either works or it doesnt. I have worked for more than just Cingular I have worked for CDMA carriers as well. When you spend as much time in wireless as I have and you up to snuff on how all of this works then come tell me how you feel.. your compairing apples to oranges in some respects.

I can be more specific with my example. I didn't say I am *in* the mountains, just near them. Before and after this bridge, both Verizon and Cingular can get a signal. For some reason, the bridge seems to be a deadspot. I do notice that I lose more "bars" there, but never lose a signal or drop the call. On the other hand, like I said, my familys Cingular phones lose the signal completely. They do pick it up 1/4 mile after the bridge, but it goes dead there. If you look at Cingulars coverage maps, that spot is supposed to have coverage. Text I don't know if that link will work but if it does you can see for youurself.

Apples and oranges? CDMA and GSM? ??

And Telephia can say something without being involved in legal action.. at least not as a defendant. What do they have to hide? There's no reason not to release the results/methonds/details to the public if the results aren't cooked. Oh, wait, maybe that's why they'd get in trouble and why they aren't releasing them... sure it sounds like a consipicy theory, but it sure seems to be playing out nicely for Cingular's marketing.

And to respond to your previous comment about how Cingular has everyone beat in rural areas.. also not entirely true. I was in CT for the summer and spent a LOT of time in NYC. Same deal up there. Verizon, impressive. Cingular, better up there than Virginia, but still not impressive.
 

AMDMaddness

Platinum Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,406
2
81
Apples and oranges? CDMA and GSM? ??


yeah its like AMD and Intel they both in the end do the same thing but both have there strong points over each other. A coverage map isnt perfect and its more of a guide IMHO the marketing people come out with that stuff not the operations folks thats for sure.

Mountain areas are one of the hardest to cover areas RF is like sound its more directional than anything dips and valleys get shot right over etc unless you have something poining right down there.

CDMA has the advantage of being able to talk on more than one site at a time witch helps in areas like that but CMDA sites "breath" they get smaller as more people talk on it which in turn kills the coverage and during a high traffic time you may never be able to make that call. A GSM site doesnt get smaller with more calls. There are a ton of what either can do or cant do the list goes on.

I like CDMA better than GSM it simply uses less freq to get the job done and is more dynamic when it comes to t-1 use etc. Cingular will be CDMA b4 to long (w-cdma) so it will even out on the being able to use more than one cell site aspect and come down to who has more tower in more places than another... I enjoy this back and forth banter.

Pete
 

mb

Lifer
Jun 27, 2004
10,233
2
71
Originally posted by: AMDMaddness
Apples and oranges? CDMA and GSM? ??


yeah its like AMD and Intel they both in the end do the same thing but both have there strong points over each other. A coverage map isnt perfect and its more of a guide IMHO the marketing people come out with that stuff not the operations folks thats for sure.

Mountain areas are one of the hardest to cover areas RF is like sound its more directional than anything dips and valleys get shot right over etc unless you have something poining right down there.

CDMA has the advantage of being able to talk on more than one site at a time witch helps in areas like that but CMDA sites "breath" they get smaller as more people talk on it which in turn kills the coverage and during a high traffic time you may never be able to make that call. A GSM site doesnt get smaller with more calls. There are a ton of what either can do or cant do the list goes on.

I like CDMA better than GSM it simply uses less freq to get the job done and is more dynamic when it comes to t-1 use etc. Cingular will be CDMA b4 to long (w-cdma) so it will even out on the being able to use more than one cell site aspect and come down to who has more tower in more places than another... I enjoy this back and forth banter.

Pete

So you don't think that my example clearly contradicts your statement that "unlike CDMA which works or doesn?t GSM at least lets you hold onto that call even when its less than perfect rather than drop you"? Both have service around it, but only one loses it. The CDMA phone didn't stop working, while the GSM one stopped when the signal was less than perfect.

WCDMA sounds like a welcome change, but as I said, how many years will it take for them to a) upgrade their current network and b) expand the WCDMA coverage to match or beat Verizon in the US?

I too enjoy this banter, I like how neither of us has resorted to name calling, especially here on ATOT :D

Edit: yo momma uses prepaid! oooooooooooooooooooooo
 

chambersc

Diamond Member
Feb 11, 2005
6,247
0
0
Originally posted by: AMDMaddness
Huge improvement we have more cell sites than any other company period. We have added and moved thousands in the last couple of years.

Pete (cell site engineer Cingular)

</thread> ?
 

AMDMaddness

Platinum Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,406
2
81
Originally posted by: supafly
Originally posted by: AMDMaddness
Apples and oranges? CDMA and GSM? ??


yeah its like AMD and Intel they both in the end do the same thing but both have there strong points over each other. A coverage map isnt perfect and its more of a guide IMHO the marketing people come out with that stuff not the operations folks thats for sure.

Mountain areas are one of the hardest to cover areas RF is like sound its more directional than anything dips and valleys get shot right over etc unless you have something poining right down there.

CDMA has the advantage of being able to talk on more than one site at a time witch helps in areas like that but CMDA sites "breath" they get smaller as more people talk on it which in turn kills the coverage and during a high traffic time you may never be able to make that call. A GSM site doesnt get smaller with more calls. There are a ton of what either can do or cant do the list goes on.

I like CDMA better than GSM it simply uses less freq to get the job done and is more dynamic when it comes to t-1 use etc. Cingular will be CDMA b4 to long (w-cdma) so it will even out on the being able to use more than one cell site aspect and come down to who has more tower in more places than another... I enjoy this back and forth banter.

Pete

So you don't think that my example clearly contradicts your statement that "unlike CDMA which works or doesn?t GSM at least lets you hold onto that call even when its less than perfect rather than drop you"? Both have service around it, but only one loses it. The CDMA phone didn't stop working, while the GSM one stopped when the signal was less than perfect.

WCDMA sounds like a welcome change, but as I said, how many years will it take for them to a) upgrade their current network and b) expand the WCDMA coverage to match or beat Verizon in the US?

I too enjoy this banter, I like how neither of us has resorted to name calling, especially here on ATOT :D

Edit: yo momma uses prepaid! oooooooooooooooooooooo


Me saying it either works or it doesnt refers to calls inservice and coverage areas. During a CDMA call it either works or it doesnt there is no grey area. The coverage aspect is if there is no service then there is no service were as your CDMA has service and can make the call were there is no GSM service to even make a marginal call. They dont all use the same towers, or antenna down tilts, antenna types, etc. Even carriers on the same cell site tower can have very differant coverage due to this.

WCDMA will take a couple of years so far we have mostly on the west coast atlanta some parts of florida and some of the northeast. We are building them as fast as the vendors (seimens and Ericsson can make them) The UMTS coverage will be on the same cell site towers as GSM but with UMTS we get an instant 3db (every 3db is twice the power) better downlink so they will cover even better than GSM.

And my momma does use prepaid!!! :Q nah she uses a CDMA carrier thats not Cingular shocker! and no Cingular doesnt have coverage where she lives thats why she has another carriers service.


Edit- the carolinas will be UMTS by the middle of next year we are already 20% done here.
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,883
63
91
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: AMDMaddness
Huge improvement we have more cell sites than any other company period. We have added and moved thousands in the last couple of years.

Pete (cell site engineer Cingular)

</thread> ?

Not in So Cal. My friends with Cingular say it's still the suck.
I visited my relatives in eastern PA and they are mad my Verizon phone works everywhere, and their phones don't work in their own house. (kind of in the hills).
Manhatten Cingular customers were royally pissed. That was a huge outrage that circled around the cell phone forums.
GSM is better, but it's going to take a while for Cingular to catch up.
 

bigrash

Lifer
Feb 20, 2001
17,648
28
91
i had Cingular about 4 years ago and it sucked around here. Then I switched to Nextel and now I'm back with Cingular for the last 1.5 years and the coverage is way better than what it was a few years back.
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
22,546
832
126
Cingular is misleading with their commericals and the "fewest dropped calls" It's not a percent, it's a number thing. And, they don't have as many subscribers. That's like me making hard drives, only selling 100 a year and claiming "fewest RMAS!" Now I know Cingular has a lot of customers, but they don't have as many as Verizon, so they may have fewer dropped calls, but I bet the percentage is higher.

is their network getting better? sure, but doesn't mean the commerical ain't false advertising.

 

AMDMaddness

Platinum Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,406
2
81
Originally posted by: QueBert
Cingular is misleading with their commericals and the "fewest dropped calls" It's not a percent, it's a number thing. And, they don't have as many subscribers. That's like me making hard drives, only selling 100 a year and claiming "fewest RMAS!" Now I know Cingular has a lot of customers, but they don't have as many as Verizon, so they may have fewer dropped calls, but I bet the percentage is higher.

is their network getting better? sure, but doesn't mean the commerical ain't false advertising.

You couldnt be more wrong Cingular has more customers than any of the US carriers they are the largest. The comercial is not false it was verified by telephia as discused earlier in this thread.
 

mb

Lifer
Jun 27, 2004
10,233
2
71
Originally posted by: AMDMaddness
Originally posted by: QueBert
Cingular is misleading with their commericals and the "fewest dropped calls" It's not a percent, it's a number thing. And, they don't have as many subscribers. That's like me making hard drives, only selling 100 a year and claiming "fewest RMAS!" Now I know Cingular has a lot of customers, but they don't have as many as Verizon, so they may have fewer dropped calls, but I bet the percentage is higher.

is their network getting better? sure, but doesn't mean the commerical ain't false advertising.

You couldnt be more wrong Cingular has more customers than any of the US carriers they are the largest. The comercial is not false it was verified by telephia as discused earlier in this thread.
Actually it really hasn't been verified, as discussed earlier in this thread. Read these as well:
Text
Text
Text

Fact is, there is no concrete evidence to support Cingulars claims.
 

AMDMaddness

Platinum Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,406
2
81
Originally posted by: supafly
Originally posted by: AMDMaddness
Originally posted by: QueBert
Cingular is misleading with their commericals and the "fewest dropped calls" It's not a percent, it's a number thing. And, they don't have as many subscribers. That's like me making hard drives, only selling 100 a year and claiming "fewest RMAS!" Now I know Cingular has a lot of customers, but they don't have as many as Verizon, so they may have fewer dropped calls, but I bet the percentage is higher.

is their network getting better? sure, but doesn't mean the commerical ain't false advertising.

You couldnt be more wrong Cingular has more customers than any of the US carriers they are the largest. The comercial is not false it was verified by telephia as discused earlier in this thread.
Actually it really hasn't been verified, as discussed earlier in this thread. Read these as well:
Text
Text
Text

Fact is, there is no concrete evidence to support Cingulars claims.

I just called up some upper folks and they assure me we are number one with the least amount of dropped calls. Cingular and the top three's lawyers talk daily compairing stats. I will say this Verizon is nipping at our heals on dropped calls they may surpase use they may not.. we have a directive to not do anything that could cause a dropped call like taking down a sector of a site during the day etc. We try hard I will tell you that.
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,160
1,634
126
I've had Cingular for about 3 years now. I probably only average about 300 to 400 minutes per month on my Cell, however, I have never had any problems at home.

When I visit family up in Sturgeon Bay though, The reception is total crap. It has gotten a bit better, as to where I get 1 bar now, as opposed to just bluntly saying "no service." Ahh well.
 

MrBond

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2000
9,911
0
76
I have Verizon and it rocks for coverage. Rural areas especially. One of my friends has Cingular and her coverage is pretty spotty, even in town.

I know Verizon has a detailed coverage map on their website where you can zoom down to street level and see what kind of service you can expect (Digital, Extended Network Digital, etc). It's pretty accurate from what I can tell.

Verizon may not own as many towers, but they buy coverage from other providors to shore up their network. Where my Mom and Dad live, they use the Extended Network on Verizon, which is really Alltel coverage, but they don't get charged roaming.