J jawknee530 Senior member Jan 16, 2007 213 0 76 Jan 28, 2008 #1 7.5 seems a little low. Even with a 450Mhz FSB you'll CPU will be at only 3.375Ghz. Anyone have any OCs done on this chip yet?
7.5 seems a little low. Even with a 450Mhz FSB you'll CPU will be at only 3.375Ghz. Anyone have any OCs done on this chip yet?
J jawknee530 Senior member Jan 16, 2007 213 0 76 Jan 28, 2008 #2 I just noticed that the 9300 has only 6MB of L2 cache. Looks like the 9450 is a much better choice for not much more money.
I just noticed that the 9300 has only 6MB of L2 cache. Looks like the 9450 is a much better choice for not much more money.
R RaulF Senior member Jan 18, 2008 844 1 81 Jan 28, 2008 #3 Q93 are not out yet, and yes most people will most likely get the 94 because of the cache.
C Cheex Diamond Member Jul 18, 2006 3,123 0 0 Jan 29, 2008 #5 Highest OC so far with a Q9300 has been 3910.04MHz or 3.91GHz. Here is the link: CPU-Z Verified Edit: That was done on air!!
Highest OC so far with a Q9300 has been 3910.04MHz or 3.91GHz. Here is the link: CPU-Z Verified Edit: That was done on air!!
Ika Lifer Mar 22, 2006 14,264 3 81 Jan 29, 2008 #6 That's an insane FSB for a quad. I'd kill someone if that were stable.
C Cheex Diamond Member Jul 18, 2006 3,123 0 0 Jan 29, 2008 #7 Yes it is insane. I think that is a good indication of what to expect with the Q9450...