Originally posted by: Stunt
I respect the ppl on this forum who supported the war and now feel as though they were misguided realizing it was expensive and on false justifications (wmd) but continue with their hopes for the nation they supported an attack on.
But why in the hell are you supporting it now?!...it's costing $200,000,000,000+ and why not invade the other 50+ countries with dictators and few freedoms and rights? 😛
Iraq was selected for a few reasons, IMO:
1 - State sponsor of terror, even if not al Qaeda (Saddam sent moneys to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers) - made a good excuse after 9/11
2 - They had a substantial military (at least on paper - 6th biggest in the world), so others would take notice if we toppled them
3 - Their 'substantial' military was weakened by the first Gulf War and years of sanctions, so we knew it would be child's play to take them out, but it would still seem impressive due to the on-paper strength
4 - We had war plans drawn up for such an action for more than 10 years, so a very impressive invasion could be waged for everyone to see
5 - Besides all of the WMD stuff, there was plenty of humanitarian cause to lend credence to the invasion after the fact
Combining all of the above factors, it seemed like a good shot for us to topple one 'powerful' country very impressively to intimidate everyone else into going along with us and stopping support for terrorism (or whatever else ails you). In essence, I see it as a collosal gamble - bet the farm on Iraq in hopes that you won't have to pay out for the rest of eternity dealing with these other nations.
That's how I see it, anyway. I don't know, nor will I ever, whether or not Bush and Co ever really thought Iraq had WMD, nor what would have happened had we not invaded. After all is said and done, some things went much better than I ever thought possible, others not so much, but the proof is in the pudding - we don't know the resolution just yet.