<< Don't hold your breath people. They invented the concept of CHOKE. They've been doing it for 23 years; this season will be no different.
Russ, NCNE >>
You must be talking about some other team. The Mariners don't have any history of choking.
The first 15 or so years, they were just bad (And should have been bad). The team was not expected to do anything. No choking involved there.
1995, they were 13 games out of first place in August, yet came all the way back to tie the Angels at the end of the season. They won the one game playoff to take the division crown. That was the first year that they were in contention at hte end of the season, and they won the division. No choking there.
In the 1995 playoffs, they played New York. New York won the first two games at Yankee Stadium. Seattle took the next three (including an extra inning game and winning hte final game in the last at-bat in the 9th inning) to win the series. No choking there. They were overmatched in the next series against Cleveland, so no one expected them to win, so losing that series could hardly be called choking.
In 1997, the second year that they were in contention at the end of the year, they maintained their lead over the rest of the division and won the AL West. No choking there. Again they weren't expected to win their playoff series, so their loss could not be considered a choke.
In the 2000 playoffs, they swept the White Sox in 3 games. No choke there. They lost to the Yankees in 6 games, but it was not a choke.
So what, pray tell, is their history of choking? The only thing remotely close is when the A's won the division in 2000. However when the A's go 40-15 in the last 55 games (approximately), and the Mariners win 60% of their games at the same time, you can't call that a choke.