How fast is your car? List (or estimate) your 1/4 time

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: Vic
Uh oh... you brought up a DSM Eclipse. Now M4H is going have to tell us all about walking cranks. :p

FWD? What year/model? Going off your username, sounds like a 2G GS-T Spyder, yeah?

Haha if anyone walks one, I have a 6-bolt 4G63T with an extra manual (i.e. larger cams compared to auto) turbo head I'd sell them ;).

As for my Altima... I donno... I don't race >_>. It has great acceleration though, but the torque steer is just horrid at 70mph (highway driving).

EDIT:

After reading another section in here, M4H, I'm one of those people that has a higher belief that performance on a curved track (a mountain pass or touge could be considered one) is better than a straight-away. They also test the driver's technique better than just testing his ability to shift at the proper time. You know if they end up in a ditch or off the tarmac, they're probably one of those people that you mentioned (the overzealous high school fast and the furious type :p).

I'll be honest and say what everyone knows. Drag racing in a straight line on the street is really a big penis contest to prove who has the fastest newest most expensive car or to exert power over someone to feel macho. It's just an extention of underlying human nature to desire to be bigger, faster, stronger, etc. than someone else. When someone starts revving at you at the light, they aren?t bragging about their racing skills, they are saying their car is better/shinier/more expensive, just like they do when flashing their cell phones around, post computer specs in their sigs, etc. Revving at a light is communicating their intent to rub it in when the light turns green by blowing you away and showing you how inadequate your car is compared to theirs, just the same as overclocking to stay in the 3D Mark top 10. Sad but true, even though 3D Mark never killed anyone, but that?s what most casual spontaneous stoplight racing is about.

Unfortuneately it?s usually just stupid little kids who know nothing whose parents buy them new cars (like Alienware PCs) when they turn 16, esp. more expensive flashier gizmo laden ones like BMWs, etc, that are obviously going to be faster than the Kia that someone else buys with their own money working 3 jobs. When these kids encounter someone who can waste them, they can't fathom it since like a spoiled brat they usually get their way all the time. Much like a spoiled brat throwing a fit, they refuse to admit defeat and give it up, so they push their car and inexperienced driving abilities well beyond their limits. Combine that with typical teenage immortality, and you have trouble.

Summary: street racing in a straight line isn't about skill, it's just a bunch of snobby rich kids showing off their parents money.

In a real drag race though when you are talking 4 second ETs at over 300 mph there is ALOT more skill involved than most people give credit for. Not only for the drivers, but the tuners as well flexing every ounce of engine knowledge they possibly can, limited not by money but only by the periodic table of elements (i.e.: material strength, etc.). They basically rebuild a 8000 HP engine running on liquid explosive every pass down the track in a matter of minutes. For the driver its a race against the clock, traction, timing, and the other driver. For the tuner, its a race against only himself and physics. That to me is where the fun is, ridiculous power and racing as an application of F=ma physics. I'm not talking handling and power to weight ratios plodding along in corners, I'm talking about what goes on inside the engine itself. Energy densities, fluid dynamics of air flow, tensile and compressive rod forces, moving parts always kept on the verge of melting with .001" clearance changing direction 233 times every second at 7000 RPM, etc, in order to make the most powerful and efficient engine possible with a given platform.

A top fuel rail dragster is the fastest accelerating vehicle on the planet, far faster than even a rocket or space shuttle =D Pick any car in the world that your heart desires, cross the starting line from a 200 mph roll at the same time a dragster starts from a dig. The dragster will school you every time. Fathom that for a minute and the engineering feat that makes it possible. A top fuel engine is one of the modern wonders of the world :D If you don't think so, take a 8000 HP dragster engine back to the late 1800's, early 1900's and ask the pioneers of internal combustion engines what they think after describing energy, work, power, flow, molecular science, potential energy, etc, at a time when 20 HP was as record.

Nope, no skill at all, anyone can just pick up a brush and put a renaissance painter to shame ;)
 

melchoir

Senior member
Nov 3, 2002
761
1
0
Originally posted by: exdeath
I'll be honest and say what everyone knows. Drag racing in a straight line on the street is really a big penis contest to prove who has the fastest newest most expensive car or to exert power over someone to feel macho.


Or sometimes, it's just fun to go fast. For a lot of cars that trap 150mph, going around twisties at those speed is just out of the question.

A lot of the people I hang out with just enjoy going to the track and going WOT and trying to best themselves. More of these people care about personal achievement/goals then racing the car next to them.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Originally posted by: melchoir
Originally posted by: exdeath
I'll be honest and say what everyone knows. Drag racing in a straight line on the street is really a big penis contest to prove who has the fastest newest most expensive car or to exert power over someone to feel macho.


Or sometimes, it's just fun to go fast. For a lot of cars that trap 150mph, going around twisties at those speed is just out of the question.

A lot of the people I hang out with just enjoy going to the track and going WOT and trying to best themselves. More of these people care about personal achievement/goals then racing the car next to them.

Pretty much what I was getting at in the second half of my post, with real racing as opposed to kids with their parents credit cards. The race against yourself and physics, especially within the constant constraint of a particular type of car and a budget.

I'd be happy just tearing down and rebuilding the same engine all day and learning something new each and every time if I didn't have to work for a living and it was someone elses money heh.
 

SVT Cobra

Lifer
Mar 29, 2005
13,264
2
0
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
My Kenny Bell will beat just about anything besides a Veyron from a dig, that includes the Z06.

That being said, as soon as I get my hands on a Comp Orange coupe I want to TT the biatch and run in the low 9's with 25+ lbs of boost, race gas like others have.

Anyway my best DSG time was 11.05, stock F1 tires which suck, powershifting. I would buy some Hoosiers, but since it has been a cold winter here I have not gotten around to it.

Anyway there is a lot of BS going on in this thread.

+1 for fellow Terminator driver :thumbsup: DSG coupe? Thought your DSG was a vert? Is this your third? I want a coupe, can't even pass tech for one run with a vert and no cage...

I don't know about the new LS7 Z06 though... 10.85 on DRs factory stock and n/a! The LS8 is going to be a blown LS7 putting down 650 HP on pump gas in a 3,200 lb car with superior aerodynamics...

For the very first time since I got my Cobra I'm kinda scared :D Think what a intake, exhaust, pulley and tune will do with a factory built and blown 427!! At least it's more in the exotic class and I'll probably never see one around here... Hahah it can waste any Porsche on any euro road course and beat a Ferrari from 0-100-0 for 1/3 the price. Whats this about American cars suck? Leaf springs and push rods > 'exotic technology' LMFAO

Anyway I better start saving up for that VT 324 heh. Those guys are making 1400 HP with only 20psi, ie: good for pump gas. Should be good for 1000+ RWHP

Traded the Vert for the stock coupe + 6k cash.
 

zylander

Platinum Member
Aug 25, 2002
2,501
0
76
My '96 Maxima 5-speed does low 15's stock. The fastest I ever got it at the track was mid-high 14's. I never got a chance to go back to the track with all the other stuff I had put on before I sold it all, but I should have been around low 14's, possibly even high 13's.
 

herm0016

Diamond Member
Feb 26, 2005
8,510
1,123
126
lets see... the 72 super cheyenne short box w/ 4.10 posi, built th400 w/ 2200 stall and a BB 402, matched and ported alum single plane, demon 750, 10 to 1 compression, 1.85 rollers and near a half inch of lift in the cam should do about 11 or 12 in the 1/4 when its all done with some good rubber. :)
my 99 olds 88 i would guess 16ish.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
Originally posted by: exdeath
I'll be honest and say what everyone knows. Drag racing in a straight line on the street is really a big penis contest to prove who has the fastest newest most expensive car or to exert power over someone to feel macho.

Agreed :p.

Originally posted by: exdeath
In a real drag race though when you are talking 4 second ETs at over 300 mph there is ALOT more skill involved than most people give credit for. Not only for the drivers, but the tuners as well flexing every ounce of engine knowledge they possibly can, limited not by money but only by the periodic table of elements (i.e.: material strength, etc.). They basically rebuild a 8000 HP engine running on liquid explosive every pass down the track in a matter of minutes. For the driver its a race against the clock, traction, timing, and the other driver. For the tuner, its a race against only himself and physics. That to me is where the fun is, ridiculous power and racing as an application of F=ma physics. I'm not talking handling and power to weight ratios plodding along in corners, I'm talking about what goes on inside the engine itself. Energy densities, fluid dynamics of air flow, tensile and compressive rod forces, moving parts always kept on the verge of melting with .001" clearance changing direction 233 times every second at 7000 RPM, etc, in order to make the most powerful and efficient engine possible with a given platform.

Now I suspected you were talking about the type of people with normal cars like your first scenario. I know how the second is a bit different as I've watched my fair share of Driving Force (Ashley Force is hot :p).

Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
2007 Altima 3.5 SE (CVT), goes from 0-60 in 6.3 seconds, I think its 1/4 time is mid-high 14.

Is that in manual shift mode? ;)
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Originally posted by: thetxstang
Originally posted by: Gillbot
best et: 11.8
best mph: 121

car in sig, not stock

Very nice, overall, but your et is a bit high for that mph.

Thats typical with bad 60' times due to poor launching, traction issues, lots of top end power with no bottom end torque, centrifugal induction lag, big cams, running on DOT rubber, etc. With a modded LS1 Z28 I'd say its a launching/traction fight on street tires and most likely has a lumpy high RPM cam, etc.

A lumpy cam is a LS1s best friend, but the problem is you are pinched between two constraints. If you launch at a low RPM you bog the engine on that big cam, but if you launch high RPM, you break loose, so finding a comprimise can be challenging.
 

jme5343

Platinum Member
Nov 21, 2003
2,333
0
71
Originally posted by: thetxstang
Originally posted by: Gillbot
best et: 11.8
best mph: 121

car in sig, not stock

Very nice, overall, but your et is a bit high for that mph.

I don't think they're necessarily from the same run.
 

melchoir

Senior member
Nov 3, 2002
761
1
0
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: thetxstang
Originally posted by: Gillbot
best et: 11.8
best mph: 121

car in sig, not stock

Very nice, overall, but your et is a bit high for that mph.

Thats typical with bad 60' times due to poor launching, traction issues, lots of top end power with no bottom end torque, centrifugal induction lag, big cams, running on DOT rubber, etc. With a modded LS1 Z28 I'd say its a launching/traction fight on street tires and most likely has a lumpy high RPM cam, etc.

A lumpy cam is a LS1s best friend, but the problem is you are pinched between two constraints. If you launch at a low RPM you bog the engine on that big cam, but if you launch high RPM, you break loose, so finding a comprimise can be challenging.


I'm betting stock internals, and a 150 shot, probably on DRs that still spin. (Nitto 555R perhaps?)
 

Abel007

Platinum Member
Jun 12, 2001
2,169
0
76
1/4 mile is somewhere around 15 seconds, maybe a tick less.

Sure is fun around corners though. :D

 

thetxstang

Senior member
Sep 30, 2004
542
0
0
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: thetxstang
Originally posted by: Gillbot
best et: 11.8
best mph: 121

car in sig, not stock

Very nice, overall, but your et is a bit high for that mph.

Thats typical with bad 60' times due to poor launching, traction issues, lots of top end power with no bottom end torque, centrifugal induction lag, big cams, running on DOT rubber, etc. With a modded LS1 Z28 I'd say its a launching/traction fight on street tires and most likely has a lumpy high RPM cam, etc.

A lumpy cam is a LS1s best friend, but the problem is you are pinched between two constraints. If you launch at a low RPM you bog the engine on that big cam, but if you launch high RPM, you break loose, so finding a comprimise can be challenging.

Agreed that E.T.'s like that can be due to some of the variables you cited. The point in my post, although it may not have been obvious, was the original OP has room for significantly lower E.T.'s if he can address the aforementioned variables, particularly poor launching, poor traction, and perhaps better shifting. :)

For the record, I remember when my LX 5.0 Notchback was running consistent 11.80's. My MPH was in the 113 to 114 range. When I modified the car further to run 120-122 MPH in the 1/4, my E.T.'s were in the 11.20's to 11.30's.
 

thetxstang

Senior member
Sep 30, 2004
542
0
0
Originally posted by: jmebonner
Originally posted by: thetxstang
Originally posted by: Gillbot
best et: 11.8
best mph: 121

car in sig, not stock

Very nice, overall, but your et is a bit high for that mph.

I don't think they're necessarily from the same run.

:confused:

While that's certainly possible, what could possibly be your point? That his 121 MPH run was achieved on a 12.1 sec. run, perhaps? That his 11.8 sec run was accompanied by a 119 MPH showing?
 

erickj92

Banned
Jan 3, 2007
309
0
0
Well i dont know the time of a quarter but my Alero goes 108 before the engine shuts off, its a 2003, 4 cylinder with no modifications....i know its slow...
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
umm 20 secs? i have no idea

i drive a 88 volvo 240 Wagon

i readlly dont care that its not fast, it gets me from point A to point B just fine
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Originally posted by: Abel007
1/4 mile is somewhere around 15 seconds, maybe a tick less.

Sure is fun around corners though. :D

There is a turn off at the end of the drag strip, lets see if you can finish it before the 10 second 'straight line only car' next to you can =D

Catch is you have to get there before he does... he'll be staging for the next run by the time you get to the turn.

There, thats what I think about 'the twisties' :D
 

Gillbot

Lifer
Jan 11, 2001
28,830
17
81
Originally posted by: thetxstang
Very nice, overall, but your et is a bit high for that mph.

I know, i have traction/launch issues.

Originally posted by: exdeath
Thats typical with bad 60' times due to poor launching, traction issues, lots of top end power with no bottom end torque, centrifugal induction lag, big cams, running on DOT rubber, etc. With a modded LS1 Z28 I'd say its a launching/traction fight on street tires and most likely has a lumpy high RPM cam, etc.

A lumpy cam is a LS1s best friend, but the problem is you are pinched between two constraints. If you launch at a low RPM you bog the engine on that big cam, but if you launch high RPM, you break loose, so finding a comprimise can be challenging.

i have a cam-n-more. ;)
EDIT> There's a mod list and dyno graph floating around here in ATOT somewhere.

My car had a great torque curve but my gearing and suspension setup is less than optimal. My cam also pulls VERY hard in the higher RPM band.

Originally posted by: jmebonner
I don't think they're necessarily from the same run.

they are not. 11.8 was at 118, i ran a 12.5 or so on the 121mph pass. BAD wheelspin but i stayed in it.

Originally posted by: melchoir
I'm betting stock internals, and a 150 shot, probably on DRs that still spin. (Nitto 555R perhaps?)

running 100% n/a, cammed, etc. STOCK heads, they've never been off the car or touched. No giggle here.
Originally posted by: thetxstang
:confused:

While that's certainly possible, what could possibly be your point? That his 121 MPH run was achieved on a 12.1 sec. run, perhaps? That his 11.8 sec run was accompanied by a 119 MPH showing?

see above.

I know my et's have ALOT of room for improvement but the car as it sits now just can't launch. Besides, I'm still on a stock 10 bolt with a high stall converter so it's all borrowed time. Either the trans or rear will let go at some point.

EDIT #2> You usually get your lowest MPH on your best ET because your run is more "efficient" at comering the given distance. When you spin/launch poorly, your MPH usually goes up unless you REALLY tank the run.