How fast is your car? List (or estimate) your 1/4 time

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jimbob200521

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2005
4,108
29
91
My 02 Cavalier Z24 does 15.44 with minimal mods. I know I could have gotten under 15.4 if I could have got a launch worth anything that day. I've got upper/lower motor mounts, B&M short throw, and an intake for my mods thus far. I was planning on doing a lot more, but that is kinda out of the question now :(
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Hm... interesting, since I never claimed they were stock. :confused:

Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: multiband8303
Originally posted by: Ronin
stock Z06 = 10s
/shens
Z06 + drag radials = 10s

Either you're backing up the claim that "stock Z06 = 10s" and neglecting to make the connection that drag radials aren't stock, or your comment is just totally irrelevant to the discussion, in which case, this thread is now about pie. :p

- M4H
 

jme5343

Platinum Member
Nov 21, 2003
2,333
0
71
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Hm... interesting, since I never claimed they were stock. :confused:

Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: multiband8303
Originally posted by: Ronin
stock Z06 = 10s
/shens
Z06 + drag radials = 10s

Either you're backing up the claim that "stock Z06 = 10s" and neglecting to make the connection that drag radials aren't stock, or your comment is just totally irrelevant to the discussion, in which case, this thread is now about pie. :p

- M4H

And M4H, I'm still pissed at you for not getting a GS or a GTP ;)
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Howdy. I'd estimate that I'd do low 15s in the quarter mile...

1998.5 Contour SVT
Transplanted 3.0L block
K&N open air filter
Weapon-R Headers
Um...I forget the brand of after-cat exhaust
 

multiband8303

Senior member
Aug 8, 2005
593
0
0
Originally posted by: Ronin
Originally posted by: multiband8303
Originally posted by: Ronin
Don't know about the fastest car, but probably the knowledge.

My Z06 does the 1/4 in just under 11 seconds, mod free (why mod an already amazingly fast car....0-60 in 3.7 stock).

Your vette, bone stock runs high 10's?

/shens

your vette runs high 11's, on slicks, with a perfect driver, not you. Too lazy to look up now, but I invite you to go on over to C&D and look up there results.

As for the OP with the Regal GS, those things are great cars, and I actually believe his times.

And when you know what I'm capable of, come talk to me. Until then, shens all you want. (love how people spout because they don't think someone's better than them). ;)

And yes, I neglected to mention my 1 run (yes I was only able to break 11s once...specifically, 10.99) had slicks on, and it was done here in San Diego.

Scan your slip, should be real easy - as for my best time (old car of mine)

03 Subaru WRX
Stage 2 Kit
Stock Turbo
3.5 Custom mendrel pipe TBE (including gutted up/down-pipe)
WalBro 255 Fuel Pump
UTEC Fuel Management (Piggyback off of stock ecu)
110 Octane Gas

12.7 (1.6 60 foot) @ 119

and yes I do have the slip, and will be more then happy to prove that, is it fast? Nope, but it's what I got, out of MY car, not bench racing.
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: giantpinkbunnyhead
LOL my 1/4 mile time would be measured in minutes, not seconds. I love my Ranger to death, but why Ford decided 154HP for a V6 in a 3800 lb truck was adequate, is beyond my sense of reason.

Because they knew people like you would still buy it :)
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: jmebonner
And M4H, I'm still pissed at you for not getting a GS or a GTP ;)

I couldn't find one that was worth what they were asking. Used-car market around here sucks wind harder than a 3.1 pullied L67. ;)

- M4H

Edit: That -> Than
 

melchoir

Senior member
Nov 3, 2002
761
1
0
Originally posted by: multiband8303
12.7 (1.6 60 foot) @ 119

and yes I do have the slip, and will be more then happy to prove that, is it fast? Nope, but it's what I got, out of MY car, not bench racing.

1.6 60', 12.7 at 119?? Please scan that.. 119 with a 1.6 60 should be mid to lower 11s.

 

sonoma1993

Diamond Member
May 31, 2004
3,412
20
81
i'm not to sure what my truck run in the 1/4 mile. But from what over on mys10.net. The gmc sonoma/chevy s-10 with the 4.3L V6 run about high 15's to about mid 16's depending on mods and rearend gear.

i drive a 99 gmc sonoma ext cab 4.3L V6 4speed automatic, 3.42 rearend gear.
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: melchoir
Originally posted by: multiband8303
12.7 (1.6 60 foot) @ 119

and yes I do have the slip, and will be more then happy to prove that, is it fast? Nope, but it's what I got, out of MY car, not bench racing.

1.6 60', 12.7 at 119?? Please scan that.. 119 with a 1.6 60 should be mid to lower 11s.

1 = He pooched a shift.
2 = His timing's off because he didn't finish the dyno tune for race gas.
3 = 1+2?

- M4H
 

melchoir

Senior member
Nov 3, 2002
761
1
0
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: melchoir
Originally posted by: multiband8303
12.7 (1.6 60 foot) @ 119

and yes I do have the slip, and will be more then happy to prove that, is it fast? Nope, but it's what I got, out of MY car, not bench racing.

1.6 60', 12.7 at 119?? Please scan that.. 119 with a 1.6 60 should be mid to lower 11s.

1 = He pooched a shift.
2 = His timing's off because he didn't finish the dyno tune for race gas.
3 = 1+2?

- M4H

I'm not buying that he missed a shift and still trapped 119. Unless his car was capable of much more, which by his post doesn't sound likely, as it sounds like a personal best.
 

jdoggg12

Platinum Member
Aug 20, 2005
2,685
11
81
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/cou...oupe_comparison/quarter_mile_test.html


Dating back to the days of flathead Fords on dry lakebeds, quarter-mile acceleration is still a benchmark of performance. However, a vehicle properly set up for straight-line quarter-mile fun doesn't have to worry about turns like our roadgoing tuner cars; their tighter suspension and less weight transfer equates to reduced straight-line traction. Not that you can hook up 1000-plus horsepower with normal radial tires, even with the best suspension. With wildly overpowered vehicles, acceleration times aren't as quick as you might expect (due to excessive rear tirespin), but terminal velocity is shockingly fast. Such was the case with our group.

All too often, magazine stories include phrasing such as "If we only had more traction," so for fun we offered up a challenge to the tuners: three runs on Michelin PS2 radials and three runs on BFGoodrich DOT-approved Drag Radials. While not as grippy as true wrinkle-wall drag slicks, Drag Radials offer a glimpse of what a vehicle can do with added adhesion. Two tuners took us up on our challenge.

As the benchmark, the Z06 ran first. With not much drama the 505-horsepower car logged a 12.0-second e.t. at 123.5 mph. With a stout number as a target, the Livernois Mustang stepped up to the plate for its best swing. Despite the car's hurt engine, the Livernois crew insisted that testing progress. As expected, copious wheelspin, a defunct cam sensor, and an oily undercarriage don't make the best recipe for quick times, as evidenced by a 12.9-second elapsed time.

http://www.vetteweb.com/features/vemp_0608_chevy_corvette_z06_drag_test/

Helmintoller got off to a good start, nailing an 11.88 on his first run of the day. After a pair of backup runs failed to improve upon that number, he decided to unbolt the car's factory-issue Goodyear F1 EMTs and replace them with a gummier (and slightly wider) pair of Nitto Extreme Drag radials. While the Nittos helped with consistency, they failed to effect the three-to-four-tenths e.t. improvement we typically see from such a swap.

Ironically, the drag tires may actually have been too sticky for the dead-stock Z, as our test driver found out during one especially vigorous pre-run burnout. Hoping to shave a few hundredths from the car's 60-foot times, our man heated the tires to such a degree that their grip finally overwhelmed that of the factory clutch, instantly converting several thousand miles' worth of friction material into a dense, mephitic cloud. Note to prospective drag racers: Keep SPEC's number handy.

After the wounded clutch had cooled, Helmintoller managed to record the '06's quickest time of the day, an 11.74 at 124.14 mph. With a respectable run in the bag and a 20-mile drive home ahead of him, he elected to park the car and fire up the '01.


Your vette is either not stock or something else is going on.
 

amdskip

Lifer
Jan 6, 2001
22,530
13
81
Well our dragster will run 8's but we don't know exactly how fast yet. The old dragster ran 8.30's @ 160mph.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
2005 GTO here, with JBA shorty headers and a Corsa Sport exhaust. I haven't taken it to the track yet, but I'm guessing the car will do at least mid 12s if I can get traction. With the stock tires, I'll be lucky to get in the 12's.
 

melchoir

Senior member
Nov 3, 2002
761
1
0
Originally posted by: jdoggg12
Your vette is either not stock or something else is going on.



Ranger of LS1Tech.com: C6Z06, with only Drag Radials:
His 52nd pass with the car =

60'........1.679 3650 launch rpm with a fast clutch release and fast throttle squeeze
330'......4.625
660'......7.046 102.61
1000'.....9.114
1320'...10.856 129.50

Video
 

Mellman

Diamond Member
Jul 9, 2003
3,083
0
76
my Mazdaspeed 3 does 14 in the quarter stock...never been to the strip with it though and may not go, autox > drag strip
 

DougK62

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2001
8,035
6
81
I've personally seen a C6 Z06 run in the high 10's with nothing more than drag radials. A few magazines have also done the same.

 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,883
63
91
My old Mustang will easily hit the 12's if I can put a decent set of tires on it. Right now, 13.1somethingiforgot.
My Focus, 16's lol.