How fast is a fast WiFi Connection?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

smitbret

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2006
3,382
17
81
I just ran an Internet Speedtest on my Blackberry Z10 and got 32Mbps on a 60/5.

Ran an Internet SpeedTest on my laptop and got 63Mbps on the same 60/5.

Then, I did a LAN speed test on my laptop and got 83Mbps

Changed the settings on my AP to broadcast in Wireless G only and got 21Mbps on both.

Which one is fast?

In general, take the adapter connection speed of your wireless adapter or router (whichever is lower) and figure 40% of that # is what you can get. That is fast.
 
Last edited:

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,641
13,821
126
www.anyf.ca
I just tested a proper test with my phone, I put it right under the access point and uploaded a 1GB file via FTP to it.

Got about 30mbps. Was getting about that upstairs too before I put it down there.
To download that file back I'm getting about 44mbps.

This is wireless N using a Unify AP.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,587
10,225
126
A wifi network can also be seen as a hub. Only one client can talk at a time and only one direction. Though I'm not sure if this is true with multiple antenna/radio setups.

This is changing with the advent of MU-MIMO that's coming with "wave 2" of 802.11ac gear.
 

azazel1024

Senior member
Jan 6, 2014
901
2
76
Fast wifi is exactly as fast as a fast wifi of equivalent speed.

On serious note, my internet is 50/30 and I get close to that on mine at home. Though I don't trust the android speed test app, it sends too small of a data spurt and I suspect the values may be inflated, at least the upload because it's higher than 30 when I do a test.

I will need to do a test over my LAN using a better technique to see what I get. I know I get very good speeds. My AP is only 10/100 though so obviously wont get more than 100 but don't think N can even do that.

There's also AC which is even faster than N, quick google search tells me it can do gigabit with 4 antennas at the AP and 2 at the client. (various streams I imagine)

Wifi speed can be affected by many factors though, from environment to configuration.

A wifi network can also be seen as a hub. Only one client can talk at a time and only one direction. Though I'm not sure if this is true with multiple antenna/radio setups.

Not really.

You are limited by the performance of the device that has the fewest streams/antennas. So if you client has only 2 streams, that is as fast as it can go.

In 802.11ac parlance, that would be 867Mbps for Wave 1 and Wave 2 80MHz max channel width (which is pretty much all 11ac devices right now).

That would be the PHY rate, otherwise known as the signaling rate. Very close to the router in ideal situations you could MAYBE get around 75-80% of that as payload, IE actual transfer speed. So an 867Mbps client with a router that has at least 2 streams, could do around 650Mbps absolute max. The 75-80% theoretical max is due to losses with forward error correction and some other stuff. At least so far in 11ac, nothing hits that theoretical max.

I see some stuff starting to hit the theoretical max for 11n, but it could be that the newer stuff just doesn't have the processing power, or maybe just high enough quality radios/amps to see the theoretical max throughput.

The FASTEST I've seen do a two stream 11ac connection has been about 500Mbps, which is still pretty fast.

A good 3 stream connection MIGHT hit around 750Mbps. This is all very close to the client.

As to the OP, what it SOUNDS like is, where ever he is living, he has, probably, free internet provided by his apartment management and he connects over Wifi to whatever his apartment management is providing.

Which if that is the case, improving his wifi connection MIGHT improve his internet speed somewhat. However, looking at the numbers, its unlikely to. He is likely either limited by the speed of the connection that the apartment building has, or else is limited by bandwidth controls so one user doesn't hog the entire pipe.
 

imagoon

Diamond Member
Feb 19, 2003
5,199
0
0
That isnt wifi though, its wireless but it is proprietary and not typical 802.11. Therefore it doesnt meet the wifi alliance guidelines to be called "wifi"

True but it seems like practically no one knows that. I sit near my orgs phone guy and people are constantly saying their wifi is slow (meaning Verizon, Sprint etc.)

IE I didn't assume.