• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How fast is 3D of integrated GeForce2 MX compared to....??

gplanet

Senior member
These cards:

Voodoo3 3000
Matrox G450
GeForce1 DDR
Mobile GeForce2 Go

I guess image quality of the 3D is important too.
thank ya
 
At most resolutions I would say that the integrated Geforce2mx is comparable to the Geforce 1 DDR. The other cards are somewhat slower.
 
thanks Gog

my comps have a G450 and the mobile Geforce2 and they perform well enough in 1024x768 Counter-Strike so the integrated Gf2 MX should be fine for me
 
It will play CS just fine. I had a Geforce 3 Ti 500 and I sold it before the Geforce 4 Ti 4400 came out to have money to buy the Geforce 4 Ti 4400. During the two weeks while I waited, I used the integrated video on my nForce motherboard and it played just fine. Course I couldn't run it at 4x FSAA with Aniso but it played smoothly at higher resolutions.
 
actually its a little slower than a regular mx, which is about the same as a gf256, and not as fast as a ddr gf256. check anand's 15 way gpu test
 
^^^ more like only 50% faster. MX 420 is pretty sad.... A GTS is *still* faster.

Although it does do pretty well on FSAA..... maybe EQUAL to a GTS.
 
geforce 1 DDR beats a geforce 2MX200 hands down.

An integrated geforce2mx is probably equivalent to a geforce 1sdr and lower.
 
Back
Top