Originally posted by: RossMAN
"The AT Effect" is over rated.
Originally posted by: RossMAN
"The AT Effect" is over rated.
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
i don't think AT has enough people reading at any given time to bring down a site or even appreciably slow it down.
/. is another story!
Originally posted by: RossMAN
"The AT Effect" is over rated.
Originally posted by: adambooth
Originally posted by: RossMAN
"The AT Effect" is over rated.
Agreed. It's nowhere close to the Slashdot, etc effects (which are comparable to some decent sized DDoS attacks 😉). We can still take out Geocities pages though! Arrr!
Originally posted by: RossMAN
"The AT Effect" is over rated.
Bandwidth usage (current month) 4517.28 Megabytes
Originally posted by: So
I'm mostly w/ rossman. The AT effect is WAY overrated. It's a wannabe /. effect. That said, the AT effect may not be the Jupiter-esque gas giant that /. is, the asteroid sized AT effect can sway polls and kill geocities sites if it's the middle of a weekday.
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Originally posted by: So
I'm mostly w/ rossman. The AT effect is WAY overrated. It's a wannabe /. effect. That said, the AT effect may not be the Jupiter-esque gas giant that /. is, the asteroid sized AT effect can sway polls and kill geocities sites if it's the middle of a weekday.
Back in the "The AT Effect" could cripple web sites but those days are long gone 🙁
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Originally posted by: So
I'm mostly w/ rossman. The AT effect is WAY overrated. It's a wannabe /. effect. That said, the AT effect may not be the Jupiter-esque gas giant that /. is, the asteroid sized AT effect can sway polls and kill geocities sites if it's the middle of a weekday.
Back in the "The AT Effect" could cripple web sites but those days are long gone 🙁
Originally posted by: JParker001
put a link the OP's post, and ask to spam it.
Originally posted by: kpunc
Originally posted by: JParker001
put a link the OP's post, and ask to spam it.
stafoo narb