- Dec 4, 2000
- 17,529
- 123
- 106
Saw mav yesterday it was cash 20 for 2 @ ‘matinee with a large popcorn last move I saw was joker 2019 Tom’s 10 years older than me does Scientology make you level up?
it's those thetans, he's chock full of themSaw mav yesterday it was cash 20 for 2 @ ‘matinee with a large popcorn last move I saw was joker 2019 Tom’s 10 years older than me does Scientology make you level up?
GF was all over me to see Top Gun, so we did. I have not seen any Mission Impossible movies. Edit: in my data it shows I did watch Fallout 3 years ago, was really impressed.it's those thetans, he's chock full of them
confession: i have never seen top gun, or any mission impossible movies
I thought that it was HGH...he injects himself with cash. plenty of cash.
Ah man, you're missing out! The Mission Impossible movies are SUPER fun!confession: i have never seen top gun, or any mission impossible movies
I just checked my local library online. They seem to have most all of them but I don't see the first (1996). How come? Is the first one inferior?Ah man, you're missing out! The Mission Impossible movies are SUPER fun!
Isn't that a question you should ask your library?I just checked my local library online. They seem to have most all of them but I don't see the first (1996). How come? Is the first one inferior?
Ah, but I can't expect them to answer my question: is it inferior to the others? I want to know if I'm missing out if I don't start with the original 1996 movie or if I'd best skip it. They aren't apt to tell me, but people here likely can.Isn't that a question you should ask your library?
I don't think so. You don't usually get sequels unless the first one is decent.Ah, but I can't expect them to answer my question: is it inferior to the others?
Uh, OK. But the glaring absence of it in their collection made me wonder. Not being on Netflix or other streaming services (and having just cancelled my Prime) finding the original will be a challenge... maybe ebay.I don't think so. You don't usually get sequels unless the first one is decent.
Libraries routinely purge older titles to make room for new stuff. Between Citizen Kane and MI, they'll ditch MI.Uh, OK. But the glaring absence of it in their collection made me wonder. Not being on Netflix or other streaming services (and having just cancelled my Prime) finding the original will be a challenge... maybe ebay.
Actually, looking closely, the library does have all 6. They listed the 1996 release as 2006 because it was rereleased then.Uh, OK. But the glaring absence of it in their collection made me wonder. Not being on Netflix or other streaming services (and having just cancelled my Prime) finding the original will be a challenge... maybe ebay.
That's something you put into a website so you can download an .MP4 or whatever of the movie. They often expire within a year or two of the film being released on disc anyway (the codes, not the digital copies themselves)I'm seeing some Blu-ray versions of the Mission Impossible 6 movie series offered at Ebay with the digital code, digital copy (evidently same thing) removed, but they include the unwatched BR discs. These are discounted a few bucks. What is that about? What is a digital copy/digital code?
I'm seeing some Blu-ray versions of the Mission Impossible 6 movie series offered at Ebay with the digital code, digital copy (evidently same thing) removed, but they include the unwatched BR discs. These are discounted a few bucks. What is that about? What is a digital copy/digital code?
Well, don't know why I'd want the .MP4 if I have the BR disk. Is there a reason I would/could? Is the .MP4 superior to the BR disc in any way?That's something you put into a website so you can download an .MP4 or whatever of the movie. They often expire within a year or two of the film being released on disc anyway (the codes, not the digital copies themselves)
I wondered the same thing. I guess i assumed that people want to watch movies on-the-go so would want a digital version instead of carrying around a disc. And probably it's easier to D/L a version instead of ripping for most people. I wouldn't imagine it being superior to the disc though, as far as just watching it.Well, don't know why I'd want the .MP4 if I have the BR disk. Is there a reason I would/could? Is the .MP4 superior to the BR disc in any way?
A bit of research today revealed that .MP4 is a superior format but actually inferior to DVD! So, the Blu-ray version of this has got to be miles better. The 4K would be best but not worth paying 3x as much for me. I'd probably barely notice a difference from the Blu-ray using my system. That is unless I watch from my kitchen sitting in a chair. I'll do that for The Piano, which I just bought in 4K, but I'm not sitting through 6 MI movies in my kitchen! Besides, the sound in my bedroom is superior. I may use earbuds (my usual) but I watched Fallout with the stereo (the DVD) and the sound was fantastic (say my notes from 2019).I wondered the same thing. I guess i assumed that people want to watch movies on-the-go so would want a digital version instead of carrying around a disc. And probably it's easier to D/L a version instead of ripping for most people. I wouldn't imagine it being superior to the disc though, as far as just watching it.
As far as 'how does Tom Cruise do it?'
He didn't get sucked into posting on ATOT so he has a lot more time to hone his craft.
but think what he's missing out on!As far as 'how does Tom Cruise do it?'
He didn't get sucked into posting on ATOT so he has a lot more time to hone his craft.
I think you could watch them in a random order and not lose anything in the process. The first two movies (maybe the third, can't remember) strike a completely different tone than the rest. The first film is deadly serious while being intentionally cheesy due to the source material (and IMO works reasonably well). The second is just bad: Deadly serious, possibly representing Tom Cruise at the height of his state of up-his-own-ass, including slo-mo action scenes and flowing hair. At some point in the later films IMO they realised that if they were going to keep churning these out then they needed more humour (and I think Tom Cruise matured a bit and realised that his acting ability is not going to set the world alight and just to keep doing what he's reasonably decent at). The entire series is very stereotypical "Tom Cruise movie", ie. borderline superhuman protagonist, look how great he is, good guys win and bad guys lose.Ah, but I can't expect them to answer my question: is it inferior to the others? I want to know if I'm missing out if I don't start with the original 1996 movie or if I'd best skip it. They aren't apt to tell me, but people here likely can.
The first one is actually the best one! I had to watch it like 3 times to figure it all out lol. The rest are action movies, sort of like the Jason Bourne series. First one is sort of a figure-it-out movie, like a Sherlock Holmes show.I just checked my local library online. They seem to have most all of them but I don't see the first (1996). How come? Is the first one inferior?