How does the Si 3114 SATA controller handle raid 5?

coolred

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,911
0
0
From a couple of the specs of upcoming Nforce 3 250Gb boards. The ones that are being built with the 3114 SATA controller claim to support raid 5. Now I don't know the exact numbers and everything like PCI bandwidth, so I am asking here. Would a raid 5 setup completely clog the PCI bus?
 

JBT

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
12,094
1
81
I was under the impresssion that that the new Nforce250's took the SATA off the PCI bus? or im I an idiot?
 

coolred

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,911
0
0
I was under the impresssion that that the new Nforce250's took the SATA off the PCI bus? or im I an idiot?

Yeah I think they have 2 SATA connections that run on the hypertransport bus. But it seems like a lot of the board builders are adding in another 2-4 SATA connections with an integreated controller, I am pretty sure these use the PCI bus
 

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
Originally posted by: coolred
Then why does the Asus board and I think and epox board claim it does?


Typo?????
I'm not sure, but the 3114(and the more common 3112) have been around for quite some time, and neither support anything past RAID 1/0. The offical specs of the 3114 point this out plainly, and the only SI chip that does RAID 5, is the 3124, but that's for PCI-X.
 

coolred

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,911
0
0
Well according to Wes, int he lastest socket 754 comparison they did, he says this


Epox also has used the Silicon Image SiI3114 controller instead of nVidia's accessory chip. The 3114 supports up to 4 additional SATA drives with standard RAID 0 and 1 plus the option of RAID 5 and 10. RAID 5 and 10 provide options for a Hot Spare and on-line mirror rebuilding to the 4 SATA drives.

He is just quoting the facts on the board or what?
 

Pariah

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2000
7,357
20
81
It does support RAID 5, as driver support was added after release. Since it is completely in software, the performance will be terrible while being a real drag on the CPU and not recommended for anything but data archiving.