Here in Canada we calculate our GPA based on 80-85% = 3.8, 85-90% = 3.9, 90%+ = 4.0. I know that differs from the States. I spoke to some law schools today and they said they "take into account where an individual was schooled, and the relative achievement of a student at that institution."
In terms of GPA alone (leaving the LSAT and everything else out of the picture) if I Was in the top 3% of my class (most Ivy league grad students were in the top 10% of their undergrad class) would that almost definitely satisfy my GPA requirements, even if my convereted GPA is below their average? Getting a 90%+ in most Canadian schools is unheard of, yet it's necessary to even hit a 3.67 on the LSDAS scale.
Also, jsut a note. My institution is a top notch school, it's one of the highest ranked schools in Canada (Queen's University). So it's not as if I am coming from some no name rural school.
In terms of GPA alone (leaving the LSAT and everything else out of the picture) if I Was in the top 3% of my class (most Ivy league grad students were in the top 10% of their undergrad class) would that almost definitely satisfy my GPA requirements, even if my convereted GPA is below their average? Getting a 90%+ in most Canadian schools is unheard of, yet it's necessary to even hit a 3.67 on the LSDAS scale.
Also, jsut a note. My institution is a top notch school, it's one of the highest ranked schools in Canada (Queen's University). So it's not as if I am coming from some no name rural school.