I found a 28-210mm lens from "Cosina" for a whopping $40, and figured that at that price, I could risk having a lens that produced painfully blurry pictures. The lens is labled f/4.2-f/6.5, but my Rebel XSi is showing f/4.5 at the 28mm end, and f/6.3 at the 210mm end. Don't know which one is right 
The lens itself is pretty hefty, and pretty large - a whopping 72mm. However, so far, to my amateur eye, the few pictures I've taken have been pretty good. My tripod broke last week, so I haven't taken any outdoor shots yet though.
Anyways, I'd like to see how it compares to the few other lenses I have (18-55mm IS kit lens, 28-90mm, f/1.8 50mm, but am not sure the best way to go about it. Would it really be as simple as taking shots of the same scene a couple of times with each lens, at the same focal length? Is there anything in particular I should take pictures of for a good comparison?
Feedback would be great, and I'll definitely post the results
The lens itself is pretty hefty, and pretty large - a whopping 72mm. However, so far, to my amateur eye, the few pictures I've taken have been pretty good. My tripod broke last week, so I haven't taken any outdoor shots yet though.
Anyways, I'd like to see how it compares to the few other lenses I have (18-55mm IS kit lens, 28-90mm, f/1.8 50mm, but am not sure the best way to go about it. Would it really be as simple as taking shots of the same scene a couple of times with each lens, at the same focal length? Is there anything in particular I should take pictures of for a good comparison?
Feedback would be great, and I'll definitely post the results
