- Mar 14, 2008
- 2,565
- 1
- 76
Every time I buy a new beer, I read reviews of it on BeerAdvocate. Here's one review of a beer I'm drinking tonight:
Appearance - decent bright golden straw color, a brief fizzy head disappears quick but manages to leave a few swaths of lace on the glass.
Aroma - a touch of grain sweetness, pilsnery hops too. Fresh and as it should smell.
Taste - crackery malts open up, again with an element of sweetness but not overdone. The hops are moderate, not very bitter, but assertive just the same. They do a great job of balancing up to the swallow. They resolve to a little more pils (Saaz?) bitterness on the swallow, even a flint or gunpowder kind of note. Leaves some nice flavor balance on the finish. Very authentic stuff, Zinzinnati OFest bound I believe.
Mouthfeel - crispness is the most notable thing here. The body is lagerishly smooth without being too heavy. 3.5
Drinkability - a nicely done Helles. Ought to hold its own come warmer climes and should taste just as good if the Cincinnati heat gets to it a bit, though mine is steadily disappearing.
My question is, I don't understand how they're able to analyze the beer this way. I taste it and the only thing that really comes to my mind is...it's good or it's bad. How do I develop my tastes so that I can review beers this way?
Appearance - decent bright golden straw color, a brief fizzy head disappears quick but manages to leave a few swaths of lace on the glass.
Aroma - a touch of grain sweetness, pilsnery hops too. Fresh and as it should smell.
Taste - crackery malts open up, again with an element of sweetness but not overdone. The hops are moderate, not very bitter, but assertive just the same. They do a great job of balancing up to the swallow. They resolve to a little more pils (Saaz?) bitterness on the swallow, even a flint or gunpowder kind of note. Leaves some nice flavor balance on the finish. Very authentic stuff, Zinzinnati OFest bound I believe.
Mouthfeel - crispness is the most notable thing here. The body is lagerishly smooth without being too heavy. 3.5
Drinkability - a nicely done Helles. Ought to hold its own come warmer climes and should taste just as good if the Cincinnati heat gets to it a bit, though mine is steadily disappearing.
My question is, I don't understand how they're able to analyze the beer this way. I taste it and the only thing that really comes to my mind is...it's good or it's bad. How do I develop my tastes so that I can review beers this way?
Last edited:
