Capt Caveman
Lifer
- Jan 30, 2005
- 34,547
- 651
- 126
Dumbest post so far in this thread.Originally posted by: SoundTheSurrender
Let these silly Americans drive their 2 MPG SUVs by themselves that are only good for driving through Arctic Tundra.
Dumbest post so far in this thread.Originally posted by: SoundTheSurrender
Let these silly Americans drive their 2 MPG SUVs by themselves that are only good for driving through Arctic Tundra.
I do admit that the one reason why I would enjoy an SUV over my current vehicle is that I would be sitting higher up. I feel that is safer because I can see more. However, the irony behind that is the main reason I can see more is due to the abundance of SUVs, Trucks, and Vans being the primary cause for my lack of vision.Originally posted by: waggy
yeah some of them are pretty good. With 2 young kids (one 1.5 yrs old) you need a lot of junk. considering we usualy stay a few days.Originally posted by: Xavier434
You would be surprised. My 2005 Elantra provides a very comfortable 6h ride and the millage is awesome. The reliability of the parts are also top notch. Granted, there is only so much room to pack stuff but it isn't much less than any other car whether it is considered econ or not. It has never been a problem. I have a family of 3 currently, but if that number bumped up to 4 it still wouldn't be an issue.Originally posted by: waggy
yes econ cars. but a car large enough to take 2 kids and crap on a 6h drive still have bad fuel econ. i had a taurus that sucked.
once my kids are a little older i will look into a diffrent vehicle. though most cars are still so low its hard for me to get in and out. but as little as i drive it might be worht it.
though i like my van heh.
i used to love traveling in my intgrepid... 3 kids in the back seat and a trunk full of crap, about 25mpg on the highway and a great stereo. unfortunately, the ex wife thought traveling meant take a bus like her suburban. we could seat 8 but only had 5, two dogs in the very back and a crapton of crap stowed everywhere. sure, it was roomy but the mileage wasnt as good. almost tho, on flat roads we could push 21-22 mpg out of it.Originally posted by: Xavier434
You would be surprised. My 2005 Elantra provides a very comfortable 6h ride and the millage is awesome. The reliability of the parts are also top notch. Granted, there is only so much room to pack stuff but it isn't much less than any other car whether it is considered econ or not. It has never been a problem. I have a family of 3 currently, but if that number bumped up to 4 it still wouldn't be an issue.Originally posted by: waggy
yes econ cars. but a car large enough to take 2 kids and crap on a 6h drive still have bad fuel econ. i had a taurus that sucked.
ya, my 2wd dodge ram i drive would never survive in real snow or mud. and it gets way better than 2mpg.Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Dumbest post so far in this thread.Originally posted by: SoundTheSurrender
Let these silly Americans drive their 2 MPG SUVs by themselves that are only good for driving through Arctic Tundra.