- Feb 17, 2005
- 4,682
- 1
- 0
http://www.space.com/scienceas...matter_sun_030929.html"We cannot rule out the possibility that some antimatter star or galaxy exists somewhere," Share says. "Generally it would look the same as a matter star or galaxy to most of our instruments."
Originally posted by: SsupernovaE
...if there are really anti-matter galaxies out there, then they are probably outside of our observable universe. Meaning they are either really really really far away, or in another dimension or parallel universe.
Originally posted by: Idontcare
Originally posted by: SsupernovaE
...if there are really anti-matter galaxies out there, then they are probably outside of our observable universe. Meaning they are either really really really far away, or in another dimension or parallel universe.
From where do you derive your statistics to arrive at the statement of assigning probability to the location of said anti-matter galaxies?
I know of no published data from which you could have calculated probabilities of the locations of anti-matter galaxies, inside or outside this universe. Do you?
Originally posted by: Biftheunderstudy
Currently the presence of matter in the universe is understood to come as a result of CP violation in the inflationary era of the universe. More directly, the result of a non zero barionic number, meaning for every 10 000 000 000 matter/anti matter annihilations one particle of regular matter will be created. Our universe is thought to be that 1 billionth, the left overs so to speak.
Second, if there were large amounts of antimatter in the universe there would be boundaries where the matter and antimatter annihilated and there would be very obvious radiation coming from these boundaries. This does not rule out the possibility that there is antimatter out there in large quantities, only that we should be able to see it if there is.