Remember i already compared it to Storage Review's Database and it seems like only a few of the scores are a little lower than the WD1200JB in Storagereview's (SR's) database. It isn't a huge difference but it is a little less but i don't care. Its not like its to much to care about i don't think. Then again i could be wrong.
Just was wondering how everyone else thought these Winbeach results looked to you all ?
Picture of winbench results
This is a MS Exel file of my Winbench 99 version 2.0 results on my WD 120 gig HD with 8 mb of cache in case its easier to read it like that. Right click on this and choose save target if you want to download this file of my results.
Winbench 99 version 2.0 results on my WD 120 gig HD with 8 mb of cache that will open in Winbench. Right click on it and click save target as if you choose to download this file to maybe compare two different results side by side in Winbench
So what is everyone's opinion please?
Thanks.
Just was wondering how everyone else thought these Winbeach results looked to you all ?
Picture of winbench results
This is a MS Exel file of my Winbench 99 version 2.0 results on my WD 120 gig HD with 8 mb of cache in case its easier to read it like that. Right click on this and choose save target if you want to download this file of my results.
Winbench 99 version 2.0 results on my WD 120 gig HD with 8 mb of cache that will open in Winbench. Right click on it and click save target as if you choose to download this file to maybe compare two different results side by side in Winbench
So what is everyone's opinion please?
Thanks.
Facebook
Twitter